Statement 3 is correct. One way to visualize the IRR method is to think of the venture capital method using NPV in reverse. With the IRR method, the investor’s present investment is compounded at the IRR rate over t (number of years to exit) to arrive at the investor’s expected future wealth.
Statement 4 is also correct. Private equity firms frequently use the free cash flow or a sales or earnings multiple approach to project terminal values. Debt (both junior and senior) is factored into these calculations.
For answers to questions 3-5, refer to the following table:
Fund Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Called Down |
Operating Results |
Mgmt Fees |
NAV before Distributions |
Carried Interest |
Distributions |
NAV after Distributions |
2004 |
200 |
-40 |
3.0 |
157.0 |
|
|
157.0 |
2005 |
100 |
-70 |
4.5 |
182.5 |
|
|
182.5 |
2006 |
100 |
100 |
6.0 |
376.5 |
|
70 |
306.5 |
2007 |
50 |
180 |
6.8 |
529.8 |
7.4 |
100 |
422.3 |
2008 |
50 |
250 |
7.5 |
714.8 |
46.3 |
150 |
518.5 |
Management fees are 1.50% of cumulative called down capital (paid-in capital).
NAV before distributions for any year is the NAV after distributions of the prior year, plus new capital called down, plus operating results, less management fees.
Carried interest is discussed below.
NAV after distributions for any year is NAV before distributions less carried interest less any distributions. (Study Session 13, LOS 48.l,p)