首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
Howd

Rank: 2

UID
222261 
帖子
274 
主题
71 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2013-11-4 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 18:58 | 只看该作者
Shall the Attribute 2 stated is wrong ? The solution indicated that it is correct.

The statements in 2nd paragraph on P.376 of CFAI text Vol 3 said :
...... In other words, the apparent obsevation that correlation increases in periods of market turbulance is simply an obsevation that market volatility has increased, but the "TRUE CORRELATION REMAINS CONSTANT".
收藏 分享

Valores

Rank: 2

UID
222324 
帖子
403 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 18:58 | 只看该作者
Attribute 2 is not wrong over a shorter time horizon . True correlation is measured over longer periods and indicates relatively stable correlations. Any temporary spikes in correlation due to turbulence/volatility is simply a statistical property of correlations and is inconsequential to long run returns. Collier's argument is that correlations do increase temporarily due to volatility in turbulent times , but CFAI says you can't take that to the bank and claim increased returns

TOP

Iginla2011

Rank: 2

UID
222302 
帖子
408 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-6-23 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 18:58 | 只看该作者
janakisri,

Thank you for your response !
Your explanations are resonable. However, it is not stated in text that there is relevance of volatility in short-term and long-term.

My understanding is that even markets become more volatile during turbulence, in fact, the TRUE correlation has not changed.

Any further comment ?

TOP

liangfeng

UID
218211 
帖子
659 
主题
120 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 18:58 | 只看该作者
AMA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> janakisri,
>
> Thank you for your response !
> Your explanations are resonable. However, it is
> not stated in text that there is relevance of
> volatility in short-term and long-term.
>
> My understanding is that even markets become more
> volatile during turbulence, in fact, the TRUE
> correlation has not changed.
>
> Any further comment ?

That's just one side of the argument. There are studies that justify the opposite. There is no real clear answer.

NO EXCUSES

TOP

返回列表