首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
willsucceed

UID
222258 
帖子
393 
主题
141 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者

within-sector allocation

across, secret, returns, allocation, security
i swear i'm going bananas.

when calculating the returns attributable to within-sector (i.e. security selection) do I use the benchmark weights or the portfolio weights?

maybe i'm just losing my mind but i feel like i've seen it both ways across qbank, secret sauce, CFAI, and schweser notes.
收藏 分享

nannan66

UID
218221 
帖子
525 
主题
107 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
mcap11 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Portfolio Weight of Sector (Portfolio return of
> Sector - BM return for that Sector)


I believe it's benchmark weight.

NO EXCUSES

TOP

cityboy

UID
222290 
帖子
1126 
主题
88 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-4-16 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
its benchmark weight

TOP

Windjammer

Rank: 2

UID
222305 
帖子
379 
主题
21 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-5 
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
always remember peanut_butter

TOP

justin88

Rank: 2

UID
222316 
帖子
403 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-8-2 
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
The reason you are confused is because it is presented two different ways.

In normal decomp, it is benchmark

in GLOBAL decomp, it is portfolio weight.

The formula is exactly the same other than this.

TOP

Chuckrox

Rank: 2

UID
222315 
帖子
427 
主题
12 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
6#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
the most annoying thing is that even though i stone cold memorized a formula that is a page wide when written down and can recite it from memory on command like fkn rainman, I still usually miss the problems related to this the way they ask them.

ugh.

TOP

susana

Rank: 2

UID
218224 
帖子
440 
主题
106 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
7#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
Oops my drawing got all messed up but hope you get the idea

TOP

zwjy

UID
218215 
帖子
532 
主题
118 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
8#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
he is saying there will be no more than 1 item set on it, which is likely true. In actuality, they might ask 1-2 questions on it specifically.

TOP

Iginla2011

Rank: 2

UID
222302 
帖子
408 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-6-23 
9#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:14 | 只看该作者
SS17 is way too detailed oriented for only 5% of the exam, especially reading 47 where we have to calculate the currency contribution, cap gains, etc

Might have to just hope for some lucky guesses on this part of the exam

TOP

返回列表