首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
bigredhockey55

Rank: 2

UID
223339 
帖子
323 
主题
45 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-13 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者

Use of defeasance?

generate, relevant, benefit, payment, credit
In a defeasance, if a borrower makes a relevant payment to the lender to invest in a portfolio of Treasury securities, and generate cash flows to investors... what benefit does this serve?

Reducing prepayment risk and decreasing credit risk (since Treasuries are default-free securities)?
收藏 分享

ningning1984

Rank: 2

UID
217804 
帖子
274 
主题
141 
注册时间
2011-5-24 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
been sometime since I read / reviewed this..

isn't it something related to "external credit enhancements" on Commercial MBS?

CP

TOP

Rasec

Rank: 2

UID
223461 
帖子
316 
主题
6 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-4 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
yea i know this is a form of prepayment penalty but i also never understand the purpose, as the lender can just take the money from the borrower and do as he pleases with it..what is the point of having the borrower put it into T-bills when the lender can do it himself---he's getting the money back one way or another so not seeing how its a prepayment penalty

TOP

chaojimali

UID
217986 
帖子
344 
主题
185 
注册时间
2011-5-25 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
The amt you need to supply for a defeasance is the principle + Interest portion discounted at the t-bill rate. if you were to pay off a loan without a prepay penalty it would just be the principle you would need to pay off.

stating this another way:

To repay a loan without a prepay penatly = principle on loan

To repay a loan with a defeasance prepay penalty = principle + int that would have accrued under normal payment/1+t-bill rate

TOP

needhelp1700

Rank: 2

UID
223424 
帖子
319 
主题
22 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
ninja youre right. i remember this now. the question then is, why would the borrower prepay? this seems like the most punitive type of prepayment penalty and it seems like he is in every case better off not prepaying so that he can make only principal payments.

i guess there may be certain exceptions, for exmaple needing to get your debt ratio down for reg capital/rating purposes.

TOP

yalo

Rank: 2

UID
223435 
帖子
249 
主题
5 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
6#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
Defeasance gives a higher quality asset to the loan servicer than the underlying asset (real estate, etc) with no credit risk of U.S. Treasury securities.

Correct me if I am wrong.

TOP

Otabek

Rank: 2

UID
223425 
帖子
243 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
7#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
Defeasance is a type of call protection for CMBS securities.

There are several advantages to this, first as eighty said, because you're investing in treasury securities you are increasing the credit of the pool of mortgages.

Second, unlike the other call protection provisions, there is no distribution made to the bondholders when defeasance takes place. So, since there are no penalties, there is no issue as to how any penalties paid by the borrower are to be distributed amongst the bondholders in the CMBS structure.

TOP

jacksparrow

Rank: 2

UID
223418 
帖子
305 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
8#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
How is defeasance call protection?

I think it is credit risk enahnceent , not call protection.

Call protection would be in the indenture to the securities , setting some minimum time before the issuer can make pre-payments .

Defeasance is default related risk mitigation

TOP

bdavi77962

Rank: 2

UID
223458 
帖子
310 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
9#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:30 | 只看该作者
It seems clear now that the use of defeasance is the strongest form of prepayment prepayment protection because it is the only one (out of prepayment lockout, defeasance, prepayment penalty points, and yield maintenance charges) that does not result in any payment being made to the CMBS tranches.

TOP

返回列表