首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
SkipE99

Rank: 2

UID
223352 
帖子
216 
主题
39 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-23 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 19:38 | 只看该作者

is it just me or...?

difference, different, through, error
am working through swaps (vol 6, p270- p275). why are my results different from the book? I KNOW a rounding error of 0.0002 may not sound like much, but on $100m nominal, the answer makes a huge difference.
收藏 分享

mengxu

Rank: 2

UID
217801 
帖子
238 
主题
115 
注册时间
2011-5-24 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:38 | 只看该作者
ya gotta use 4 decimals in almost every step of the calculation
slight rounding error for even the third decimal could lead to huge swap values

TOP

bbtomato

Rank: 2

UID
223436 
帖子
302 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:38 | 只看该作者
Same thing with some of the Quant material. I use six decimals. It may be overkill, but I'll never be that far off.

TOP

返回列表