首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
segalm

Rank: 2

UID
223365 
帖子
266 
主题
42 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者

Research Objectivity Standards

comply, these
Are they mandatory? Or is it optional for the firm to comply with these? TIA!
收藏 分享

yodacaia

Rank: 2

UID
223454 
帖子
341 
主题
12 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
there are several "required" policies and other "recommended" ones.

TOP

onelife1

Rank: 2

UID
223447 
帖子
344 
主题
22 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-18 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
Is it mandatory for every firm to comply with "required policies" or is it mandatory for only firms claiming compliance with Research Objectivity Standards to comply with "required policies"?

TOP

WarrenB1

Rank: 2

UID
223415 
帖子
346 
主题
18 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-7-31 
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
I want to say if you are claiming compliance then you better comply with the required policies

TOP

ap0258

Rank: 2

UID
223445 
帖子
322 
主题
15 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
Thanks Andrew. My question was more about firms not claiming compliance.
So here this goes for the last time (i hope it won't be ambiguous now):

Do the firms not claiming compliance with research objectivity standards also have to conform to required policies of research objectivity standards?

Thanks again.

TOP

iteracom

Rank: 2

UID
223456 
帖子
371 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
6#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
not really sure- probably not

TOP

genuinecfa

Rank: 2

UID
223423 
帖子
370 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
7#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45 | 只看该作者
They do not. They would have to comply with legal regulations in this country of operation, but the ROS are voluntary. There is probably some regulatory overlap.

To claim compliance, you must adhere to the required ROS. The recommended ROS are 'recommended', ie not required.

TOP

返回列表