|
- UID
- 222248
- 帖子
- 353
- 主题
- 79
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-2
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-18
|
The following statement is true -
foundation, unlike defined benefit pension plan, does not need to consider the correlation between plan sponsor financial performance and the performance of the portfolio.
i thought this was false, because if the foundation has a sponsor, and they're doing crappy at the same time the foundation portf is doing crappy, won't it hurt the foundation's risk tolerance?
is it just a semantics thing - that foundation's don't have sponsors?
if a problem told you that a company who supports a foundation does crappy whenever the foundation portfolio is doing crappy, would you use that as a reason to support lower risk toler? |
|
发表于 2011-7-11 19:45
|