首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
RoastBeef

Rank: 2

UID
222275 
帖子
265 
主题
58 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者

Entrepenuer stage... Why systematic risk?

something, specific, therefore
Can someone more clearly explain this concept to me? My logic is that, for a entrepreneur who just started a company that is pre-IPO and therefore not even public, there should be zero systematic (market) risk, and it should be all unsystematic (specific) risk.

How then, is he considered to be exposed to "total risk", or both??

Don't the stages look something like this?

Entrepreneur: unystematic
Executive: both, but more unsystematic
Investor : both, but heavily tilted toward systematic as largely diversified
收藏 分享

Analti_Calte

Rank: 2

UID
222289 
帖子
395 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-8-30 
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者
There is always systematic risk with investments - you can't diversify it away - it's the risk that has nothing to do with the firm your investing in.

TOP

cityboy

UID
222290 
帖子
1126 
主题
88 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-4-16 
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者
You have the best product in the world......... but the economy is in a deep recession and everyone is bankrupt, are you going to be able to sell it?

Systematic risk

TOP

Valores

Rank: 2

UID
222324 
帖子
403 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
4#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者
Correct, the amount of systematic risk is very small compared to a diversified investor, but it is still there and cannot be completely eliminated

TOP

bodhisattva

Rank: 2

UID
222301 
帖子
442 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-29 
5#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者
Look at the graph in the book. It makes sense.

TOP

wake2000

Rank: 2

UID
222312 
帖子
415 
主题
5 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-9 
6#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:47 | 只看该作者
I see your reasoning but I wouldn't worry too much about the magnitude of the risk because the way I understand it an Entrepneur is pre-IPO so his Residual risk could possibly be larger than the Executive or Investor. Cause of a lack of an exchange ect. That could make his systmatic risk higher or smaller than the Executive or Investor

I think the aim is to know what risks exists and not how big they are, u agree?.

TOP

返回列表