首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
fishmarket

Rank: 2

UID
223390 
帖子
217 
主题
48 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
Schweser hit me with a WACC problem where they gave me the following

Cost of equity is estimated to be 13.5% if the company issues new common stock.
Cost of retained earnings is estimated to be 12%.

I got it wrong because I used 13.5 as cost of equity and they said I should have used 12%

Its a bit sneaky. Has anyone else seen the equity component given this way?
收藏 分享

kingstongal

Rank: 2

UID
223407 
帖子
318 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
I haven't seen this before, but at first glance I would probably go with 12%, only cause it says the cost of equity is 13.5% if the company issues NEW common stock. WACC reflects the current capital structure, so the cost of issuing new equity isn't relevant.

Although cost of retained earnings would make me scratch my head a bit cause R/E is only one component of equity ...

TOP

defour44

Rank: 2

UID
223402 
帖子
263 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
Well, they just gave a list and these where the only two related to equity and no other background information.

TOP

smuggycfa

Rank: 2

UID
223462 
帖子
349 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
Umm, this has relation to other material. Pecking order theory i guess.

Any company would first prefer to use retained earnings, then debt and last choice would be equity. sneaky but interesting.

----------------------------------------

smileyface is gonna clear the CFA L2 Exam on 5th June, 2011. And making this statement won't be a violation of Code of Ethics since its a fact. ;-)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 06:40AM by smileyface.

TOP

sameeragarwal

Rank: 2

UID
223414 
帖子
347 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
My best guess is that this would be a question concerning residual dividend policy. And accordingly, the idea is to fund the equity portion of your upcoming capital budget with the help of retained earning to the greatest extent possible, and what remains is distributed to shareholders.
The idea is that when you issue new equity, there are floatation costs involved and therefore, funding your project from internally generated funds is cheaper.
I'm not sure about this.

TOP

needhelp1700

Rank: 2

UID
223424 
帖子
319 
主题
22 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
If I remember correctly from level 1 WACC is calculated on the "Marginal Cost of Capital" which would be the 13.5 so I'd disagree with schweser on this one.

In either case, there isn't a single case in the CFAI curriculum where this happens, sounds like a left over question from a time that this was actually included in the curriculum.

That's one problem with Schweser/Stalla,I was just doing some PassMaster problems and for the term structure reading, they threw some bootstrapping questions which are not tested (Level I)

- Guille

TOP

jarobi04

Rank: 2

UID
223400 
帖子
317 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
7#
发表于 2011-7-13 13:39 | 只看该作者
Schweser is correct. If the firm has enough money in RE to fund the project, the cost of equity is the internal cost (cost of RE). If the firm requires to issue stock this is externally generated and raises the cost of equity because of the issue costs.

Just pay close attention to how much the firm needs to raise (in equity that is), and use the cost of internally generated equity (cheaper) if they have enough. If they need to issue stock, then use the higher amount (cost of equity after issuing stock).

TOP

返回列表