首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
joehogue

Rank: 2

UID
222272 
帖子
301 
主题
72 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-28 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者

CFAI materials OR Schweser notes?

started, however, concepts, different, only
some concepts seem to be slightly different.

i know i should read the books if i have more time.

however, i just started my preparation for the exam.

with only 6 months left, which should i rely on?
收藏 分享

Valores

Rank: 2

UID
222324 
帖子
403 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
This topic will bring endless debate. I think either is ok, even for L3, as long as you put in the time. I used Schweser only. However most people recommend that you supplement it with questions from CFAI.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 01:25PM by ohai.

TOP

NakedPuts2011

Rank: 2

UID
222288 
帖子
321 
主题
3 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-13 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
Schweser for the reading-challenged peeps

TOP

ohai

Rank: 2

UID
222303 
帖子
400 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
If by "reading-challenged" you mean people who don't like to spend a lot of time reading CFA material, then you would be correct. If you are confident in your ability to pass these exams and want to do so in the least amount of time possible, then Schweser is a wise choice.

TOP

lcw77

UID
218209 
帖子
537 
主题
136 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
people have passed/failed using only schweser/CFAI.

Choose any combination you want.

TOP

Zestt

Rank: 2

UID
222314 
帖子
421 
主题
5 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-10-14 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
Is it just me or most of the CFAI materials are almost unreadable? There seems to be excessive footnotes and verbiages are excessively academic?

TOP

bodhisattva

Rank: 2

UID
222301 
帖子
442 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-29 
7#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:21 | 只看该作者
yorkville Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is it just me or most of the CFAI materials are
> almost unreadable? There seems to be excessive
> footnotes and verbiages are excessively academic?

I agree 100%, but knowing CFAI I would rather have the comfort of going through their material at least once and leave no stone unturned.

NO EXCUSES

TOP

返回列表