首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
HuskyGrad2010

UID
223346 
帖子
483 
主题
49 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-12 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者

private company and pvt equity

pvt, alt, important, private, company
What do you think are the most important topics in these two readings..private company(in equity) and private equity (in alt. assets)?
收藏 分享

lucasg85

Rank: 2

UID
223421 
帖子
317 
主题
7 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
agreed, in Alt inv, private equity is all about the carried interest and all those bull$hit terms

TOP

liquidity

Rank: 2

UID
223394 
帖子
274 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-7-25 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
one thing I don't get about the carried interest; it seems to be only applicable if the investments' values (collectively of total, or respectively if deal by deal) clear the committed capital.

so for example, if I commit to give $100 million, and the GP only collects $50 million, and somehow, the value of that investment makes it all the up to $80 million ($30 million in unrealized gains). Does this mean the GP doesn't get any carried interest? Would that change if he got $30 million of realized investment return?

seems weird to me that the guy would get no money other than the management fees with such great returns, just cuz he didn't take all the money that was committed to him, but that one mock question seems to imply this, at least to me.

TOP

OmarAdnan

Rank: 2

UID
223446 
帖子
405 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
The GP only collects carried interest once the value of the fund exceeds the committed capital. So in magicskyfairy's example, he does not receive carried interest until after the fund surpasses 100 million.

The thought behind it is the J-curve return and that the GP should not earn "excess return" until he has returned all committed capital back to the fund.

TOP

scarecrow

Rank: 2

UID
218000 
帖子
278 
主题
132 
注册时间
2011-5-25 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
ok, thx

TOP

senlinlang

Rank: 2

UID
217995 
帖子
325 
主题
171 
注册时间
2011-5-25 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
what about hurdle rates? suppose in my example, it was 10%; lets suppose the NAV of the fund gets up to $109 million, that's shy of the 10% hurdle mark, so no carried interest.

what happens if it gets up to $111 mil? does the guy get carried interest of ... say it's 20%, so would it be 20% of 11 mil, or 20% of 1 mil that he gets?

TOP

jarobi04

Rank: 2

UID
223400 
帖子
317 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
7#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
If there is a hurdle rate, then yes, the GP must surpass the hurdle rate as well before collecting carried interest. The carried interest would only be on the return in excess of the hurdle rate. In your example it would be 200,000 (20% of 1 million).

TOP

yospaghetti

Rank: 2

UID
223443 
帖子
283 
主题
10 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
8#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:57 | 只看该作者
awesome, thanks

TOP

返回列表