首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
Dapper425

Rank: 1

UID
222286 
帖子
220 
主题
40 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 16:12 | 只看该作者

Net vs. Gross

management, carried, net, General
I read GIPS today and took notes, so I hope we all agree on this:

AMC: Gross AND Net
GIPS General Provisions: Gross OR Net, but Gross recommended
P/E: Gross AND Net
P/E Fund of Funds: Gross (while presentation should be gross of management fees, it should still be net of parternship, fund, expenses, and carried interest--and of course, trading expenses)
Real Estate: Gross OR Net
Wrap fee/SMA: Net

Chain linking noncompliant returns: 1/1/2000 for Generral GIPS, 1/1/2006 for RE, P/E, SMA
收藏 分享

oneboy

UID
218217 
帖子
493 
主题
94 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:12 | 只看该作者
We can chainlink not compliant returns only if they occur pre-2000..otherwise, no go.

Wrap/SMA - you can present gross if you can somehow break out trading expenses from the bundled fee. IF you cant break um out, you have to report net and remove the entire bundled fee.

TOP

mar350

UID
222322 
帖子
461 
主题
17 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-7-31 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:12 | 只看该作者
paraguay---you agree with the fund of funds disclosure?

TOP

ohai

Rank: 2

UID
222303 
帖子
400 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:12 | 只看该作者
Why doesn't CFAI just make it required to report both net and gross then it'll be easier for you, me, them, everyone.

TOP

返回列表