首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
mfleming1983

Rank: 2

UID
223195 
帖子
191 
主题
148 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-23 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者

Impairment LLA vs. Revaluation Model

states, beyond, previous, carrying
Long Lived Assets:
On page 433 it states that under IFRS any impairment write downs can be reversed up to the previous carrying value.

On page 640 it states that IFRS can use the Revaluation Model (vs. Cost Model which is applicable to GAAP) which allows for write up's, up and beyond carrying value - recognizing revaluation surplus.

What am I missing??

Thanks!
收藏 分享

farrukhsadiq

Rank: 2

UID
223292 
帖子
219 
主题
105 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-10 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者
Yup, that one got me confused too..

I think the essence of it is that IFRS can carry assets above historic cost.

TOP

nitoha

Rank: 2

UID
223257 
帖子
236 
主题
117 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-10-26 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者
adq123 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yup, that one got me confused too..
>
> I think the essence of it is that IFRS can carry
> assets above historic cost.


So I guess we then go by the revaluation model and allow assets to be carried above original carrying value - under IFRS.

Thanks. I thought maybe I was mixing up a couple things.

TOP

hariRaj

UID
223329 
帖子
304 
主题
136 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-27 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者
Kiakaha, you are right. Under IFRS you have the option to use either cost method or revaluation or a combination of the 2 as long as assets within an asset class are accorded the same method. IFRS, allows for the asset to be market at higher than original cost.

If this is reversing a previous decrease in the asset value then to the amount that was previously reported as a loss on the IS will be reported as a gain and the remainder as Comprehensive Income and revaluation surplus and vice versa.

TOP

Jolyn

Rank: 2

UID
223297 
帖子
217 
主题
121 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-10-9 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者
Ok, my understanding here is the when talking about inventory and historical cost model for long lives assets, the impairment can be reversed only up to the previous impairment. (and only in IFRS)
When using Revaluation model under IFRS, assets are presented at fair value and hence up and down both are allowed but treated differently.
Is that correct?

TOP

Mechanic

UID
223246 
帖子
623 
主题
312 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-10-11 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:28 | 只看该作者
Thanks team.

It looks like the wording between readings was a little misleading.

TOP

返回列表