首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
Chuckrox8

Rank: 2

UID
222284 
帖子
304 
主题
67 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者

GIPS - 10 or 5

required, correct, either, comply, about
In the sample, one of the firms tried to initially comply with 5 years and this was not correct. However, in the text - they can start with 5 and grow out to 10 (even if they have been in existence for more than 5. ??


Also in the sample, it says that net of fees is required (and is not talking about SMA). In the text, Gross is recommended but either are okay. ???


Not that these are the only discrepancies, but are "big ones". Any ideas for the differences?
收藏 分享

lcw77

UID
218209 
帖子
537 
主题
136 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
if i remember correctly the issue with the 5 vs 10 years was the the firm said they would just keep reporting 5 instead of adding a year each year until they hit 10.

I always though net or gross so long as disclosed per GIPS.

TOP

bkballa

UID
222297 
帖子
431 
主题
13 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-1-9 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
sounds good. thanks

TOP

Windjammer

Rank: 2

UID
222305 
帖子
379 
主题
21 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-5 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
in this particular case - composite was started in 1999 - but presentation showed only from 2005. That is not right. This would mean that the company is being selective about periods it wants to show performance, which isn't allowed per the standards.

Since the composite was created in 1999 - performance should go from 1999 onwards.

CP

TOP

NakedPuts2011

Rank: 2

UID
222288 
帖子
321 
主题
3 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-13 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
Bottom line show 10 yrs unless you don't have it. Is that right

TOP

Roflnadal

Rank: 2

UID
222306 
帖子
362 
主题
16 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-27 
6#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
Yes, but as CryFor said differently, you may have been in biz for 10 years, but to start GIPS you need only 5 and then each year add 1 more after first year.

TOP

strikethree

Rank: 2

UID
222319 
帖子
433 
主题
15 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-10-24 
7#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
here's the official GIPS wording

5.A.1 The following items MUST be presented in each COMPLIANT PRESENTATION:
a. At least five years of performance (or for the period since the FIRM’S
inception or the COMPOSITE INCEPTION DATE if the FIRM or the COMPOSITE
has been in existence less than five years) that meets the REQUIREMENTS of
the GIPS standards. After a FIRM presents a minimum of five years of GIPScompliant performance (or for the period since the FIRM’S inception or the
COMPOSITE INCEPTION DATE if the FIRM or the COMPOSITE has been in
existence less than five years), the FIRM MUST present an additional year of
performance each year, building up to a minimum of 10 years of GIPScompliant performance

TOP

mp3bu

UID
222307 
帖子
669 
主题
24 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-1-10 
8#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:34 | 只看该作者
Another wrinkle is that you could have performance data for 5 years but for some reason only the last 4 of it is compliant. (Let's assume you can't do anything to reconstruct the 1st year's performance to make it compliant.) You can still be compliant by forming your composite after the first year and reporting the 4 years that you have. But if that non-compliant year was after 1/1/00, then you can't link the non-compliant performance to the compliant performance.

Furthermore, I think it's entirely possible that have 10 years of performance that would qualify as compliant, but if you decide to form your composite starting 5 years ago (say after a bad 5 year start), there's nothing to stop you from doing so. You just can't claim compliance prior to that composite start date.

Am I wrong about this?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Friday, June 3, 2011 at 05:12PM by abmaroon.

TOP

返回列表