首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
Viceroy

Rank: 2

UID
222283 
帖子
303 
主题
80 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-28 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 16:35 | 只看该作者

Equity Style Indicies

discusses, because, category, interested, contrast
SS11 LOS J discusses the process to compare and contrast the methodologies to construct
equity style indicies. Is this to assess the style the manager is pursuing?

I am okay up to the point that says the index could be constructed as either value or growth but what is the significance of a third neutral category? Also why does an overlap come in? Is this because the stock category cannot clearly be established as growth or value? Why would a manager be interested in an index with an overlap?

Some help please.
收藏 分享

strikethree

Rank: 2

UID
222319 
帖子
433 
主题
15 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-10-24 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:35 | 只看该作者
Are you using an old text book? LOS statement from my textbook states that:

LOS32j. compare and contrast the methodologies used to construct equity style indices;

There is no 'process' nor 'discuss' in the LOS! Makes a world of difference!

Also the LOS states nothing about why a manager wants an overlap index or category. So don't bother about the manager part!

Just memorise that some index provider would categorise a stock either a growth or value while others would permit an overlap.

TOP

ohai

Rank: 2

UID
222303 
帖子
400 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-11-28 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:35 | 只看该作者
Russell Indices are an example where overlap occurs.

Since 1995 , they began allowing stocks to be members of both Large Growth AND Large Value , or Small growth AND Small value

TOP

返回列表