首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
noel

Rank: 2

UID
223372 
帖子
446 
主题
85 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2011-7-13 16:41 | 只看该作者

Clarification: FRA - Pension

principal, increase, payment, adjust, amount
Hi,

Just wanted a clarification, if Contribution > Economic Pension Expense, then treat like pre payment of principal and increase OCF and reduce FCF by the after tax amount (1-t);

if EPE > Contribution, treat like borrowing, how would we adjust FCF and OCF?
收藏 分享

senlinlang

Rank: 2

UID
217995 
帖子
325 
主题
171 
注册时间
2011-5-25 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
2#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:41 | 只看该作者
good question, the guy explaining this in schweser , stopped short of saying it. I just assumed it to be the reverse ?

TOP

FinancialAnaly

Rank: 2

UID
217810 
帖子
303 
主题
159 
注册时间
2011-5-24 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
3#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:41 | 只看该作者
Yep it is the reverse.
Increase FCF and lower OCF by after tax amount.

TOP

zephyranalyst

Rank: 2

UID
223455 
帖子
334 
主题
12 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
4#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:41 | 只看该作者
(Economic pension expense - employer contributions)*(1-tax rate)

reclassified as financing cash flow, if epe >emp contrib.

TOP

Newhuman

UID
217996 
帖子
345 
主题
185 
注册时间
2011-5-25 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:41 | 只看该作者
Why increase CFF and reduce CFO? It makes sense the other way around to me....

A prepayment of principal is a use of cash for financing purposes. The contribution would have reduced net income and thus operating cash flow.

Therefore to back out the contribution you would need to increase CFO and decrease CFF.

TOP

返回列表