首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
nixie24

Rank: 2

UID
223189 
帖子
169 
主题
154 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-1 13:08 | 只看该作者

CFAI EOC question-FSA

sales, why, problem, change, assets
On Page 357, problem # 7…I was under the impression that for Inv w. Associates, you do not factor a sub’s assets or sales, so why would asset turnover change when you exclude the sub?
what am i missing?
收藏 分享

brain_wash_your

Rank: 2

UID
222268 
帖子
265 
主题
64 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
2#
发表于 2013-4-1 13:08 | 只看该作者
The question may be referring to Quick Ratio with CA and CL. In which case CA will down and the investment will be long term asset/investment. That’s the way ive seen it tested

TOP

iteracom

Rank: 2

UID
223456 
帖子
371 
主题
11 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-2 
3#
发表于 2013-4-1 13:08 | 只看该作者
You are provided information for the Beginning and End Asset balance. for the associate.
which has to be removed. They do the same in the Nestle example while doing the ROE decomposition as well.

TOP

strikethree

Rank: 2

UID
222319 
帖子
433 
主题
15 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-10-24 
4#
发表于 2013-4-1 13:08 | 只看该作者
You are trying to value the firm without the effects of the associate. You find the average assets of the associate and then remove those from the total assets of Colorful Concepts. Just by looking at the equation of Asset Turnover=Rev/Assets..you can understand that the assets will decrease therefore increaseing the asset turnover ratio. There will be no change in revenue due to it being 20%-using the equity method.

TOP

Viceroy

Rank: 2

UID
222283 
帖子
303 
主题
80 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-28 
5#
发表于 2013-4-1 13:08 | 只看该作者
im sure im just confused, but i was under the impression that for associates, you always exclude assets anyway, and you just report your investment as a one line item…so still not sure why you have to remove these assets…

TOP

返回列表