返回列表 发帖
Does anybody know whether there is a performance tracker for the AM session?
I can see one only for the PM.

TOP

Honestly speaking it was rather easy. Scored 70 on PM, while average result in PM was 67 (ethics 2 and behavioral killed me). So everyone are very close. Somehow i even felt some sense of security, that i could pass. But this sense is false and even dangerous. I expect real exam to be much more harder. So forget your S mock results and back to books.

TOP

Ethics2 - 2/6
Behavioral Finance - 3/6
Attribution - 3/6
Overall: 16 incorrect, score 73%

TOP

Question on the Asset Allocation item set, the last one in the PM…. question 56…. I feel as though comment 1 should be correct…. Correlations do increase when periods of volatility increase, and this means that at the time you need diversification most it fails the investor…. schwesers explanation says:
Statement #1 is incorrect. Correlations between markets do appear to increase when volatility increases in international markets. However, this has been shown to be primarily a statistical aberration related to the calculations of standard deviations and correlations.
I understand that it may be a statistical aberration, however the comment is still correct in that higher volatility increases correlation which hurts someone who is trying to diversify….
anyone else feel that way about this question? typical schweser with these questions

TOP

I feel it is incorrect

TOP

what do you say is incorrect about the statement?

TOP

about the question

TOP

Went to the venue for this exam , I think this one was well rounded
AM session: 70.5%
PM session- 75%

TOP

返回列表