首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
spreads

Rank: 2

UID
223397 
帖子
276 
主题
21 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-4 07:20 | 只看该作者

Ethics Suitability question

lawyer, guess, something, question, involved
If a PM receives written consent from all clients to invest in something outside the original IPS, it’s a go right?
There have been a few questions where the answer no even through there’s written consent. One question involved getting consent from the pension fund’s lawyer, which I guess isn’t good enough.
A little help here?
收藏 分享

therecruit

Rank: 2

UID
223353 
帖子
253 
主题
33 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-15 
2#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:24 | 只看该作者
yeah consent from anyone other than the client wouldn’t be good enough. But get it from the client and you’re good to go, I believe.

TOP

dirk01

Rank: 2

UID
223342 
帖子
272 
主题
36 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-21 
3#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:31 | 只看该作者
Yeah you have to change the IPS

TOP

Sunshine4ever

Rank: 2

UID
223386 
帖子
313 
主题
69 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
4#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:35 | 只看该作者
According to the Changing Investment Objectives section of Schweser Book 1, “Notify investors and potential investors of any potential change in the security selection and portfolio construction processes and secure documentation of authorization for proposed changes.”
So I guess it’s ok if you get written consent from investors without changing IPS…

TOP

bcp901

Rank: 2

UID
223387 
帖子
232 
主题
62 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
5#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:38 | 只看该作者
You have to be careful as well with the IPS in regards to a beneficiary. In a bene. requests a change to an IPS regardless of it written or not, you dont change the IPS.

TOP

fishmarket

Rank: 2

UID
223390 
帖子
217 
主题
48 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
6#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:42 | 只看该作者
Can you explain that please cson99? I don’t think i follow you. Reference would help too…

TOP

HuskyGrad2010

UID
223346 
帖子
483 
主题
49 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-12 
7#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:45 | 只看该作者
It was an exam question from Stalla’s practice exam book, monring session, exam #2.
The beneficiary of a trust had provided the PM written instructions to invest outside the IPS, the correct answer was to ignore their request. As simple as that

TOP

AndyNZ

Rank: 2

UID
223344 
帖子
339 
主题
47 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-29 
8#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:49 | 只看该作者
hmmm must be specific to a trust then. Because the material clearly states my quote above…

TOP

jcfa2011

Rank: 1

UID
223391 
帖子
213 
主题
35 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
9#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:53 | 只看该作者
Yeah I happen to agree with you and got the question wrong, thats why I want to mention becareful if you are dealing with a benefiary or trust.

TOP

wizofoz

Rank: 2

UID
223399 
帖子
290 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
10#
发表于 2013-4-4 07:56 | 只看该作者
When you are referring to a “trust” I take it to me that you are referring to a multi-beneficiary trust like a defined benefit pension trust correct?
i.e. a beneficiary of the Coca-Cola defined benefit pension plan would like the small cap PM to purchase a micro cap bio tech stock.

TOP

返回列表