首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
Zestt

Rank: 2

UID
222314 
帖子
421 
主题
5 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-10-14 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-8 12:52 | 只看该作者

Intercorporate Investments - Consolidation

statements, interest, balance, company, revenue
I don’ think this should be that hard, but I am a little confused.
Example:
Company 1 has a 50% interest in company 2 and company 1 is deemed to have control.
When consolidating the financial statemetns what % of company 2 assets, liab., revenue, and income will company 1 show on it’s financial statements?
EOC Questions 7 - 12 for this chapter make it seem as if Company 1 will record 100% of company 2 assets/liab. on it’s own balance sheet, 100% of revenue, and only 50% of net income.
If that is correct, why does company 1 record 100% of company 2 revenue, but only 50% of income? (or maybe I am just misunderstanding)
Thanks.
收藏 分享

towardsutopia21

Rank: 2

UID
223206 
帖子
198 
主题
153 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-14 
2#
发表于 2013-4-8 12:52 | 只看该作者
When consolidating it takes on the full assets and liabil, revenue expenses, but it subtracts minority interest before NI, so that brings net income down to the 50% mark if you know what I mean

TOP

rkapoor

Rank: 2

UID
223274 
帖子
238 
主题
123 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-21 
3#
发表于 2013-4-8 12:52 | 只看该作者
Right, we gross it all up acting like we own 100%, but we really don’t, so back out the 50% minority interest. Net income is equal among all methods.

TOP

liquidity

Rank: 2

UID
223394 
帖子
274 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-7-25 
4#
发表于 2013-4-8 12:53 | 只看该作者
Ok that is what I thought…..so profit margin will be lower when a company has control (shows 100% revenue, 50% of income) vs. signficant influence (0% revenue, 50% income) correct?

TOP

返回列表