首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
返回列表 发帖
jcole21

Rank: 2

UID
222270 
帖子
270 
主题
53 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-27 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-19 17:47 | 只看该作者

2011 pm Q23 Core-satellite portfolio

remember, least, 2011, higher, manager
If the weight of passive manager is least among the managers, can you still call a core-satellite portfolio?
In Q23
active manager A 40%
active manager B 40%
passive manager C 20%
I remember in the curriculum the weight of passive manager is higher than 50%
收藏 分享

cfalevel2011

Rank: 2

UID
222269 
帖子
300 
主题
69 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
2#
发表于 2013-4-19 17:49 | 只看该作者
im not sure about percentages but i believe you need a large core to mitigate the active risk of the satelites.
if your core is 20% (s&p500) and satelites are each 40% (small and micro cap), im not sure how the core can mitigate so much active risk.
any other thoughts?

TOP

BelalM

Rank: 2

UID
223453 
帖子
304 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
3#
发表于 2013-4-19 17:51 | 只看该作者
I can not find any limitation on percentage of core (minimum) in curr. That ‘s also my confuse…

TOP

spartanag07

Rank: 2

UID
223299 
帖子
278 
主题
135 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-23 
4#
发表于 2013-4-19 17:53 | 只看该作者
It’s still a Core-Satelite strategy - Low investment in core (passive or semiactive) reflects high risk tolerance

TOP

spartanag07

Rank: 2

UID
223299 
帖子
278 
主题
135 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-23 
5#
发表于 2013-4-19 17:54 | 只看该作者
I guess that is the explanation from the answer. Did you find something similary in the curriculum?

TOP

ap0258

Rank: 2

UID
223445 
帖子
322 
主题
15 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
6#
发表于 2013-4-19 17:56 | 只看该作者
this is a BS question and has been discussed to death in recent years - use search
how is 20% considered CORE? crazy, but so goes CFAI theory and wording

TOP

返回列表