首页 | 学习中心 | 注册 登录
12
返回列表 发帖
meghanjackson

Rank: 2

UID
223377 
帖子
280 
主题
58 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
11# 跳转到 »
发表于 2013-8-8 09:03 | 只看该作者
im with my boys Steely Dan and the German.

TOP

SpyAli

Rank: 2

UID
223440 
帖子
306 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-6 
12#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
Captain Save a Ho has sour grapes

TOP

CFA4Techie

Rank: 1

UID
223374 
帖子
202 
主题
40 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-23 
13#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
Lol.. relax

TOP

OmarAdnan

Rank: 2

UID
223446 
帖子
405 
主题
14 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
14#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
I have a burning desire to know if you can hedge a cuspy coupon?

TOP

tobeornottobe

Rank: 2

UID
223457 
帖子
298 
主题
1 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
15#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
yes futures could have negative convexity. futures have MTM effects as well as the CTD bond could change. in short it is possible for futures to have negative convexity whereas an individual bond has positive convexity if it’s a plain bullet non callable

TOP

parott

Rank: 2

UID
223362 
帖子
241 
主题
57 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-5 
16#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
Coub Douglas  (New Query)
Incase of Cobb Douglas when should you take %TFP=0? Schweser says %TFP=0 incase of Constant Returns to scale.

TOP

bdavi77962

Rank: 2

UID
223458 
帖子
310 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
17#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
simplex, read the CFAI books, not Schweser kid cudi.

TOP

Dapper425

Rank: 1

UID
222286 
帖子
220 
主题
40 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
18#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
Pistol Pt - The link you have mentioned doesnt give any final resolution to using %TFP =0 in a Cobb Douglas Fn. Plz clearly put your views on TFP values incase of Constant Returns to Scale.

TOP

stalkey

Rank: 2

UID
223459 
帖子
302 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-4 
19#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:04 | 只看该作者
1Big Studd Muffin - have studied both. Dont make tall statements without knowing facts.

TOP

random_walker47

Rank: 2

UID
223429 
帖子
305 
主题
8 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
20#
发表于 2013-8-8 09:05 | 只看该作者
Could you restate the question? I don’t see what the issue is, if we have constant returns to scale, you know TFP….what is the problem? TFP has nothing to do with constant returns to scale…

TOP

12
返回列表