注册 登录
上一主题：Ethic Q
下一主题：pooling vs purchase
123
返回列表 发帖
thommo77

Rank: 3Rank: 3

UID
222320 
帖子
448 
主题
21 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-12-8 
21# 跳转到 »
发表于 2011-7-13 15:22 | 只看该作者
Read the Glossary at the back of CFAI Volume 2:
anchoring trap - the tendency to give disproportionate weight to the first information received.
status quo trap - the tendency for forecasts to perpetuate recent observations

So anchoring favors the first information received while status quo favors the last. It makes sense when you think of the meaning of the status quo. It means the way things are now. So if you have a status quo bias, you think things will not change from the way they are now.

Maybe one way to remember this is to think bothl of these biases will cause your ship to sink. What will hit bottom first? The anchor. Thus anchoring favors the first info received.

TOP

aidebaobao

Rank: 2

UID
218212 
帖子
287 
主题
71 
注册时间
2011-5-26 
最后登录
2012-9-12 
22#
发表于 2011-7-13 15:23 | 只看该作者
Status quo seems to favor not changing views and just keeping the same. Object in motion must stay in motion.

Anchoring puts too much credence in prior views and not enough in current views. Object is in motion but has slowed but will speed back up again.

Representativeness is the opposite of anchoring, imo. Object slowed down, now it is really going to slow down.

Bayesian Rigidity uses same views even in the face of new and very conflicting information. I do not believe that the object has slowed down, even if it did slow down it is temporary.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, June 2, 2011 at 09:45AM by Paraguay.

TOP

123
返回列表
上一主题：Ethic Q
下一主题：pooling vs purchase