注册 登录
上一主题：FSA: equity, proportionate consolidation and consolidation
下一主题：Basic EPS ( Schweser note)
返回列表 发帖
NakedPuts00

Rank: 2

UID
222287 
帖子
292 
主题
10 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-29 
1# 跳转到 » 倒序看帖
打印
tT
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者

Intercorporate Investment

all, Investment, understand, different
Is anyone else confused by all the different rules between purchase method vs acquisition method between US GAAP and IFRS?
The CFAI text is so badly written in my opinion. All the rules are scattered all over the place. No single rule is hard to understand. But I am having trouble knowing which rules belong to which method.

 

相关主题：

. Schweser wrong on GIPS?

. Sinking fund- Real Estate Investment Analysis

. Sinking fund- Real Estate Investment Analysis

. FSA 1题 诚恳请教

. [CFA一级]MOCK上面的一个题目

收藏 分享

dkishore1

Rank: 3Rank: 3

UID
223244 
帖子
240 
主题
128 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-10-18 
2#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
Seems alot easier to me this year than last year. As far as I’m concerned, the only point we have to remember is in relation to using full (US GAAP) or partial (IFRS) goodwill.

TOP

scruge

Rank: 2

UID
223215 
帖子
150 
主题
127 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-26 
3#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
I thought GAAP and IFRS both got rid of purchase method and its now “acquisition method”?
IFRS uses partial or full
GAAP uses full goodwill only
What if firm A bought 80% of firm B’s shares but had no board members or decision making? this would be accounted for using acquisition method correct? The 80% ownership counts as control?

TOP

transferpricing

Rank: 2

UID
222278 
帖子
295 
主题
68 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2016-4-19 
4#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
Are we responsible for knowing the purchase method even after it has been replaced by the acquisition method? Thanks.

TOP

ShooterMcCFA

Rank: 3Rank: 3

UID
223243 
帖子
238 
主题
153 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-8-11 
5#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
Dude purchase method is the same as acquisition method no?

TOP

SeanWest

Rank: 2

UID
223460 
帖子
322 
主题
9 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2014-8-7 
6#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
That is why I said I am confused. There is the old purchase method and the new acquisition method. Then there are differences between US GAAP and IFRS…..

TOP

PalacioHill

Rank: 2

UID
222325 
帖子
366 
主题
5 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2015-1-15 
7#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
The Old PURCHASE method is HISTORY!

TOP

TheMBAGlover

Rank: 2

UID
223205 
帖子
267 
主题
168 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-10-21 
8#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:57 | 只看该作者
OMG! the acquisition method is the new purchase method
Totally! and red is the new orange!

TOP

scruge

Rank: 2

UID
223215 
帖子
150 
主题
127 
注册时间
2011-7-11 
最后登录
2013-9-26 
9#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:58 | 只看该作者
Thanks guys. It is a relief to know that I can ignore the old method.

TOP

LPoulin133

Rank: 2

UID
222255 
帖子
263 
主题
68 
注册时间
2011-7-2 
最后登录
2014-6-28 
10#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:58 | 只看该作者
Historically (prior to June 2001), two accounting methods were used for business combinations: 1) pooling interests method 2) purchase method.
Over the last few years, the pooling method has been eliminated from US GAAP and IFRS. Although, as analysts, we must still be aware of the pooling method as many companies accounted for acquisitions under the pooling method.
Now, we have the acquisition method. Both US GAAP and IFRS require that the acquirer measure the identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree at FAIR VALUE as of the date of the acquisition.
I hope this clears things up.

TOP

返回列表
上一主题：FSA: equity, proportionate consolidation and consolidation
下一主题：Basic EPS ( Schweser note)