|
- UID
- 223462
- 帖子
- 349
- 主题
- 14
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-8-6
|
22#
发表于 2013-8-6 10:26
| 只看该作者
Here’s a disturbing counter point for the schweez:
consider the Singer-Terhaar approach for defining the risk premium of an asset class in integrated markets
RP(ac) = Std Dev(ac) * Corr(ac,GIM) * [RP(GIM) / Std Dev(GIM)]
where RP = Risk Premium or R - Rf; and GIM = Global Investable Market
rearranging this formula and expanding we have:
[R(ac) - Rf] / Std Dev(ac) = [R(GIM) - Rf] / Std Dev(GIM) * Corr(ac,GIM)
or rather Sharpe(ac) = Sharpe(GIM) * Corr(ac,GIM)
Now the GIM is certainly a diversified portfolio so why can we use the sharpe ratio in this situation? By Schweser’s rationale the ratio used should have been the Treynor ratio.
If I am wrong someone please explain it to me, but I think Schweser may have taken to many assumptions in thier conclusion to this answer. |
|
