Based on a comparison of the actual trailing P/adjusted CFO ratio compared to the industry median trailing P/adjusted CFO per share ratio for 2008, Sanford:
A) |
may be undervalued relative to the industry benchmark because Sanford’s P/adjusted CFO ratio is higher than the industry median, despite slightly higher systematic risk and lower 5-year earnings growth. | |
B) |
is overvalued relative to the industry benchmark because Sanford’s P/adjusted CFO ratio is higher than the industry median, despite slightly higher systematic risk and lower 5-year earnings growth. | |
C) |
is correctly valued relative to the industry benchmark because Sanford’s P/adjusted CFO ratio is equal to the industry median, despite slightly higher systematic risk and lower 5-year earnings growth. | |
Sanford’s adjusted CFO is equal to net income plus depreciation minus the increase in net working capital (excluding cash and notes payable) plus after-tax interest expense:
Sanford is overvalued relative to the industry benchmark because its P/adjusted CFO ratio is higher than the industry median of 2.0, despite slightly higher systematic risk (as measured by beta) and a lower 5-year earnings growth forecast. (Study Session 12, LOS 43.m)
Which of the following market multiples is most appropriate for Davenport to use in international valuation comparisons?
A) |
Price-to-adjusted CFO. | |
|
C) |
Enterprise value-to-EBITDA. | |
Using relative valuation methods that require the use of comparable firms is challenging in an international context due to differences in accounting methods, cultures, risk, and growth opportunities. Further, benchmarking is difficult because P/Es for individual firms in the same industry vary widely internationally, and country market P/Es can vary significantly. Common differences in international accounting treatment fall into several categories: goodwill, deferred income taxes, foreign exchange adjustments, R&D, pension expense, and tangible asset revaluations.
The usefulness of all price multiples is affected to some degree by differences in international accounting standards. The least affected are price-to-cash flow ratios (including P/adjusted CFO), while P/B, P/E, P/S, P/EBITDA, and EV/EBITDA will be more seriously affected because they are more affected by management’s choice of accounting methods and estimates. (Study Session 12, LOS 43.n)
The value per share of Sanford’s common equity, based on a single-stage residual income model, is closest to:
The first step is to adjust the book value for the actual pension liability, which is equal to the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the PBO: $1,000 – $1,600 = –$600. The offsetting entry to equity is a decrease of $600(1 – 0.4) = $360. Therefore book value per share for 2008 is:
The value of the common equity according to the single-stage residual income model is:
(Study Session 12, LOS 45.d)
For purposes of this question only, assume Sanford’s ROE is 20%, its current market price is $25, and the cost of equity is 14%. Sanford’s implied growth rate in residual income is closest to:
The first step is to adjust the book value for the actual pension liability, which is equal to the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the PBO: $1,000 – $1,600 = –$600. The offsetting entry to equity is a decrease of $600(1 – 0.4) = $360. Therefore book value per share for 2008 is:
BVPS = (7,189-360) / 500 = $13.66
The implied growth rate can be calculated as:
(Study Session 12, LOS 45.g)
|