It is quite apparent that PER time PAT represents the value of the firm at that time and the complete expression really represents the investor’s share of the value of the investee firm. The following example illustrates this framework:Example: Best Mousetrap Limited (BML) has developed a prototype that needs to be commercialized. BML needs cash of Rs2mn to establish production facilities and set up a marketing program. BML expects the company will go public in the third year and have revenues of Rs70mn and a PAT margin of 10% on sales. Assume, for the sake of convenience that there would be no further addition to the equity capital of the company.Prudent Fund Managers (PFM) propose to lead a syndicate of like minded investors with a hurdle rate of return of 75% (discounted) over a five year period based on BML’s sales and profitability expectations. Firms with comparable sales and profitability and risk profiles trade at 12 times earnings on the stock exchange. The following would be the sequence of computations:In order to get a 75% return p.a. the initial investment of Rs2 million must yield an accumulation of 2 x (1.75)5 = Rs32.8mn on disinvestment in year 5.BML’s market capitalization in five years is likely to be Rs (70 x 0.1 x 12) million = Rs84mn.Percentage ownership in BML that is required to yield the desired accumulation will be (32.8/84) x 100 = 39%Therefore the post money valuation of BML At the time of raising capital will be equal to Rs(2/0.39) million = Rs5.1 million which implies that a pre-money valuation of Rs3.1 million for BMLAnother popular variant of the above method is the First Chicago Method (FCM) developed by Stanley Golder, a leading professional venture capital manager. FCM assumes three possible scenarios – ‘success’, ‘sideways survival’ and ‘failure’. Outcomes under these three scenarios are probability weighted to arrive at an expected rate of return:In reality the valuation of the firm is driven by a number of factors. The more significant among these are: Overall economic conditions: A buoyant economy produces an optimistic long- term outlook for new products/services and therefore results in more liberal pre-money valuations. Demand and supply of capital: when there is a surplus of venture capital of venture capital chasing a relatively limited number of venture capital deals, valuations go up. This can result in unhealthy levels of low returns for venture capital investors. Specific rates of deals: such as the founder’s/management team’s track record, innovation/ unique selling propositions (USPs), the product/service size of the potential market, etc affects valuations in an obvious manner. The degree of popularity of the industry/technology in question also influences the pre-money. Computer Aided Skills Software Engineering (CASE) tools and Artificial Intelligence were one time darlings of the venture capital community that have now given place to biotech and retailing. The standing of the individual venture capital Well established venture capitals who are sought after by entrepreneurs for a number of reasons could get away with tighter valuations than their less known counterparts. Investor’s considerations could vary significantly. A study by an American venture capital, VentureOne, revealed the following trend. Large corporations who invest for strategic advantages such as access to technologies, products or markets pay twice as much as a professional venture capital investor, for a given ownership position in a company but only half as much as investors in a public offering. Valuation offered on comparable deals around the time of investing in the deal. Quite obviously, valuation is one of the most critical activities in the investment process. It would not be improper to say that the success for a fund will be determined by its ability to value/price the investments correctly.Sometimes the valuation process is broadly based on thumb rule metrics such as multiple of revenue. Though such methods would appear rough and ready, they are often based on fairly well established industry averages of operating profitability and assets/capital turnover ratiosSuch valuation as outlined above is possible only where complete freedom of pricing is available. In the Indian context, where until recently, the pricing of equity issues was heavily regulated, unfortunately valuation was heavily constrained. |