返回列表 发帖

L2 09年mock两题 请高手指教

 morning 59 题:

课本上说active risk squared = active factor risk+ active specific risk; 而且课本上有几乎一模一样的例题 V6 P447; total factor risk 加上 active specific risk是等于active risk squared的; 但这里的portoflio T 不对

afternoon 41 题:

American fast food 的intrinsic P/E高不是更好吗? 答案貌似说intrinsic P/E低好; 可是这个是intrinsic (justified) P/E, 不是越高越好吗?

多谢多谢!!

第2题我也不太明白,intrinsic P/E应该是基于intrinsic value的,又不是market value,怎么会overvalued 呢? 

TOP

P/E 是越低越好的。作为投资人,要做的是用低的价钱买同样earning的产品。

 

对于3楼,题目中问的是两个公司的比较,相对来说,一定有一个公司更便宜。如果是一个公司自己和自己比,你是对的。Intrinsic value 就是他的真正价格,没有overvalue 和 undervalue 的说法了。

TOP

 第一个可以说解释为not real life case;

但第二个问题还是不太明白; 在inflation pass through 的题的解释中,课本V4 213页第13题, the higher the the inflation flow through rate, the higher the P/E ratio. In other words, the less a firm is able to pas inflation through its earnings, the more it is penalized. 貌似说的是justified P/E越高越好啊

另外课本V4 P483提到 the stock's justified P/E based on forecasted fundamentals (that is, the P/E justified by fundamentals). All else being equal, the higher the expected dividend growth rate or the lower the stock's required rate of return, the higher the stock's intrinsic value and the higher its justified P/E



多谢解释

[此贴子已经被作者于2010-6-3 20:08:21编辑过]

TOP

不要太在意,mock里可以推敲的题目太多了,我做了3个mock

每套都能拿出来讨论一些

 

就当复习知识点了,考啥看啥

就够了

TOP

for your first question, I was confused too

 

When referring to the next question(#59) in the same set,  the answer of that one seems like an alternative explanation for this question. in answer of #59, it shows that the portions of contribution to the Active Risk Squred, better for a further understanding of the Answers, I guess? anyway this question sounds a little bit ugly

TOP

 关于第一题,我的理解是因为现实生活中还存在其他无法解释的风险,会体现在残差项中,所以会拉高了Active Risk Squared。

关于第二题,好的公司P/E更高,但是也更可能被高估,可能是出于这方面的考虑,从价格上来看的话,Belle更为保守和便宜。。。。,感觉也是比较难理解,我也做错了。

TOP

返回列表