Michael Sherman is a finance professor at the University of Tuskaloosa. In a recent lecture concerning the factors an analyst should consider when evaluating the impact of capital structure on the valuation of a firm, Sherman makes the following statements:
Statement 1: The changes that occur in a company’s capital structure over time are irrelevant for assessing the impact of capital structure on valuation because changes in market conditions mean that only the current capital structure is relevant for analysis.
Statement 2: If an analyst is comparing the capital structure of one firm to the capital structure of a competitor firm, it is important to adjust the analysis for differences in business risk.
Sherman’s students should agree with:
Sherman’s students should disagree with his first statement. Changes in capital structure for a firm over time is essential for evaluating whether or not management’s decisions have worked to improve the firm’s value. Sherman’s second statement is correct. Differences in capital structure could reflect differences in business risk, so the analyst should try to make comparisons based on similar business risk characteristics in order to have a true apples to apples comparison. |