返回列表 发帖

 

[此贴子已经被作者于2011-6-7 0:57:09编辑过]

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用brightcool在2011-6-5 21:07:00的发言:
constant mix ---RISK tolerance increase proportional to wealth increase

 

这个地方,constant mix应该是relative risk tolerance相对不变,absolute risk tolerance会变大

 

我觉得应该是CPPI吧由于m>1所以equity是成比例增长

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用wishmeluck在2011-6-5 21:06:00的发言:

原来牛人那么多,当初备考问问题的时候,咋牛人没出现捏?~~

 

有道题是它说是RISK tolerance increase proportional to wealth increase, 不是单纯的wealth, 如果是针对increase的话,用constant mix的risk tolerance是固定的吧 

这个我也错了,看书VOL6, PAGE 100下面的EXAMPLE 9,概念理解的问题, brightcool is right

TOP

看书 V6  98页

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用brightcool在2011-6-5 21:11:00的发言:
never deviate IPS unless you modify it with clients

The answer i chose said you can use your discretion when you see opportunity fits, but you have to agree BEFOREHAND with the client.

TOP

no , see book 264no2

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用brightcool在2011-6-5 21:22:00的发言:
no , see book 264no2

I think this different from the context in the exam, the exam question is more around tactical asset allocation, it is not improper for a manager to seize the opportunity in the market where he see fits as long as they are agree and understood with the client.

TOP

you are wrong  , never deviate IPS , law in CFAI

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用coshair在2011-6-5 21:12:00的发言:

 

这个地方,constant mix应该是relative risk tolerance相对不变,absolute risk tolerance会变大

 

我觉得应该是CPPI吧由于m>1所以equity是成比例增长

这题其实开始有提示,MANAGER PREDICT the market is non-trending, 这两道我也都错了,没找到做这类题的核心 看vol6, page 100, example 9, 基本一样

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用brightcool在2011-6-5 21:29:00的发言:
you are wrong , never deviate IPS , law in CFAI

anyway, 我保留意见

TOP

返回列表