- UID
- 223393
- 帖子
- 262
- 主题
- 7
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-7-8
|
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:25
| 只看该作者
of never mind, ignore what i said above, that applies to a diff thing i have seen before...
what you have here is just your everyday H model, the assumptions ...
you are told to use jatin's estimates....
and he/she said that it starts with a high rates and declines linearly....you are thinking about the original assumptions
now regarding the second part, you SURE are right....
first of all it is easy to see that the NP is double counted in net new borrow, and in working capital...
i would have been okay with them including it in working capital, but leaving it out of net borrowing....
but now CASH thats a big mistake! i can email CFA about it and they would add it to the erreta, i would just wait to get someone else opinion even though it seems obvious |
|