- UID
- 223455
- 帖子
- 334
- 主题
- 12
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-8-7
|
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:40
| 只看该作者
Futures contracts settle each day and a mark-to-market cash flow takes place ( typically into or out of a margin account ) , hence the term cash-flow-hedge.
Just because it settles on June 30th doesn't mean it won't settle again on Jul 1st or Jul 2nd or Jul 3rd and so on all the way to sep 30th when the need for delivery arises and the hedge can be wound down.
But since MSH hedged the exact quantity it needs of gold on June 30th , asset and hedge would move together from that point on , and the loss is locked in , all the way until Sep 30th when the hedge ( futures) and the original need for gold both expire. Since the actual cash flow on the sale takes place on 30th Sep , that's when everything is recognized in the income statement . Otherwise if we try and recognze one leg on June 30th and another on Sep 30th , it would look like separate ( unitended ) transactions and not one intended flow. I suppose on June 30th ( being a 10-Q filing date ) we could put the loss into "Accumulated comp income in the balance sheet" and the footnotes would explain that it is on account of the large gold deal that was due to deliver on Sep 30th and the hedge has suffered an initial loss . The analysts would be happy with that. FASB 133 deals with things like this |
|