Too much info or not enough? question, difficult, currently

Wendy01

On a pension company question that I came across, it says list of the company has average, above average or below average risk tolerance and state 4 reasons. Would it be appropriate to just list out: high debt ratio and low profitability, high retired to active lives, Company's plan is currently underfunded or is it more appropriate to explain further? For instance, Company is unprofitable which would make it more difficult for the company to fund future pension liabilities? Or is that self-implied?

dyga

I have to figure it is implied.

mp3bu

You are ok being concise

Chuckrox

It is implied. Dont need to write a lecture on the reasons.

mcmc

Just got down watching Stalla lectures. Said you should add a little more. Nothing crazy but if it says "high debt ratio" you should add the implication. i.e., more difficult for the company to fund or maintain surplus

thommo77

Look at how many minutes it is too - more minutes, more sentences! Explaining your reason may make the diff between 2/3 or 3/3