- UID
- 223315
- 帖子
- 199
- 主题
- 82
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-12
|
5#
发表于 2011-7-13 16:39
| 只看该作者
Choice A was definitely not correct as CFA trademarks are supposed to be published as it is, not in the abbreviated form. Means, CFA for "Chartered Financial analyst" is not wrong as long as it's used to in the right context and as adjective. Moreover, CFA is a trademark, not Charter Financial Analyst. However, "CFAC" for "CFA charter holder/candidate" or "CFAP" for "CFA Program" is not allowed.
I am not sure why blogging about broad topical areas is prohibited. I know talking about broad topic areas covered in the exam right after the exam is prohibited as it gives unfair advantage to some of the candidates -- say, if your friend appears for the exam in London and you are in US appearing after him due to TZ difference, he calls and discusses about topics covered, you will prepare more for the areas which were emphasized more in the exam and less for the topics which weren't, so you have a clear advantage here, although not much of an advantage as what can you really do right before the exam but rule is a rule.
Nonetheless, I don't think talking about broad topic areas about the exam in general is prohibited. I got the question wrong as well as I didn't know claiming about expertise is the right choice. That somehow didn't look right to me claiming your expertise based on the blog. I mean, come on, give me a break! |
|