Negative Standard Deviation? about, excel, question, possible

Mechanic

Ok heres a question i ws thinking about when doing some work in excel...

The variance of a 2 asset port = (Wa^2)(Var a) + (Wb^2)(Var b) + 2(Wa)(Wb)(Std a)(Std b)(Correl (a,b))

My question is this...lets say the correlation is -1. Wouldnt it be possible to get a variance of the portfolio that is negative? What would that mean? or am i thinking a bout this wrong?

wake2000

The least you can get is when the variances are equal, the weight is equal and correlation is -1. In this case the formula reduces [by letting Wa = Wb, and var(a) = var(b)] to:

2*(Wa^2)(Var(a)) + (-1)*2(Wa^2)(Var(a)) = 0

You will never get a negative variance.

ruchita

Spanishesk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok heres a question i ws thinking about when doing
> some work in excel...
>
> The variance of a 2 asset port = (Wa^2)(Var a) +
> (Wb^2)(Var b) + 2(Wa)(Wb)(Std a)(Std b)(Correl
> (a,b))
>
> My question is this...lets say the correlation is
> -1. Wouldnt it be possible to get a variance of
> the portfolio that is negative? What would that
> mean? or am i thinking a bout this wrong?

The variance of a 2 asset port = (Wa^2)(Var a) +(Wb^2)(Var b)
+2(Wa)(Wb)(Std a)(Std b)(Correl(a,b)) = (wa*Std a-wb*Std b)^2+2*Wa*Wb*Std a*Std b*(1+cor(a,b)). Each term is non-negative. Therefore, the sum is non-negative.

SeanWest

Forget about formulas. Just think for a second...what is standard deviation? And how can it be negative?

jarobi04

Iginla2010 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Forget about formulas. Just think for a
> second...what is standard deviation? And how can
> it be negative?


my thoughts exactly....

morebeans

obviously it cant be negative. But mathematically i looked at the equation and started thinking if the third part of the equation was negative enough, it could lead to a negative result. Was just trying to see if it was possible in the equation. I am fully aware that negative std dev wouldnt make sense.

noel

In a two asset portfolio assuming perfect negative correlation your standard deviation would be zero. The third part of the variance equation would most certainly be negative, but the first two expressions would be equal to that amount.

Part of the equation can certainly be less than zero, but it will always be offset by the first two expressions.

svgleeson

Chuckrox8 Wrote:
> In a two asset portfolio assuming perfect negative
> correlation your standard deviation would be zero.

Given a careful selection of the weights obviously.

There are some neat things about this question though...if you look at the three asset equation (and more assets as well), if you choose the correlations carelessly, it is actually possible to have the formula produce a seemingly negative variance. This is because as you add assets to the portfolio, the correlations start to become constrained based on their mutual correlations with the other assets.

e.g. if a and b are correlated, and b and c are correlated, then the correlation between a and c is bounded to something tighter than [-1,1]. If you want a tangible example of this, assume corr(a,b) = -1, and corr(b,c) = -1. What do you think the corr(a,c) has to be? (It’s 1) It can no longer be the entire range [-1,1]. If you assume it's less than 1, than weird things can happen, like you can produce a negative variance using the multi asset version of the above equation.

More technically, this is related to the covariance matrix and its property of being positive semi definite. If the matrix doesn't have this property then it could not have been obtained using real numbers. I actually busted a major investment consulting firm using an imaginary covariance matrix for portfolio construction, for ALL their clients, a few years ago.

But like everyone has already said, it's variance; the definition of variance is axiomatic....and it must be positive in the real numbers.

justin88

Var can never be negative,

and since (std dev)^2 = variance

when you squared root the Var to get Std Dev, mathematically, you will get 2 values which is one +ve and one -ve, with same magnitude

usually we will take +ve value to express, so if the std dev is 5%, it is interpreated as the extimated value can be 5% higher or 5% lower from the mean

for the equation quoted : The variance of a 2 asset port = (Wa^2)(Var a) + (Wb^2)(Var b) + 2(Wa)(Wb)(Std a)(Std b)(Correl (a,b))

for any value of correlation you input from -1 to 0, play around with the weight & std dev of each asset, you will never get -ve value as the answer, you can try and see