- UID
- 223227
- 帖子
- 654
- 主题
- 170
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
32#
发表于 2012-3-24 10:40
| 只看该作者
John Lewis, CFA, and Charlene Birdstrom, CFA, have been called out of retirement by their former employer, Price Williams, Inc. (PWI), to conduct training seminars for newly hired employees in the PWI International Equity Investment Division. Lewis and Birdstrom were asked to take on this project because they each spent 20 years in the area of international equity investments prior to their retirement a few months ago.
During their initial planning meeting, Lewis asked Birdstrom what she thought were the most important issues currently facing international equity investors. Birdstrom commented that the argument against international diversification due to increasing correlations is sure to arise. She states, “The proponents of the argument say correlations have increased over time due to a number of factors, primarily increased free trade and capital mobility, the rise in the number of global corporations, and capital market integration.”
Lewis responds by telling Birdstrom, “I think that the correlations, even if they have increased, are still low enough to justify holding international investments. However, what’s really detrimental to the idea of international diversification is the fact that correlations among markets increase during periods of increased volatility, and then remain elevated. That’s problematic. Of course pessimists also point to specific country returns and argue that diversification is pointless when their chosen market has higher returns. That’s not a valid position as far as I’m concerned.”
Birdstrom thinks it is important to address emerging markets in their seminar. She developed the following exhibit to facilitate discussion:Exhibit 1 – Emerging Markets Investing
- Emerging markets crises do not usually spread to developed markets.
- The inclusion of emerging markets in a portfolio should result in higher expected returns due to their low correlation with developed markets.
- Although the stand-alone risk of emerging markets may be high, the incremental risk from adding a 15% allocation to an all-stock portfolio should not be unreasonable.
- Crises in emerging markets are usually more prolonged than in developed markets.
One of the participants at the seminar, Jolee Cardoza, brings up the issue of individual security analysis for firms in emerging markets. She tells the group that she uses a relative value approach to stock valuation, and makes the following assertions about the advantages and disadvantages of using relative value multiples: - “One advantage of using a relative value method is that it doesn’t require the subjective projection of cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates.”
- “Another advantage is that relative value ratios use historical figures and the calculations are easy.”
- “A disadvantage is that it may be difficult to find comparable companies.”
- “Even if a comparable company can be identified, it can’t be assumed that the comparable is valued correctly. That’s another drawback of the approach.”
With respect to his comments about the arguments against international diversification:
Lewis’ correlation statement is incorrect. The issue of the stability of correlations among international markets is still unresolved. Although correlations have risen over time, they also appear to increase when volatility increases. This phenomenon occurs due to the econometrics of the correlation measure. Volatility can mask the true correlation. Academic research has found that previously reported increases in correlations during volatile stock markets were manifestations of the volatility and not increases in the true correlations. Lewis’ country-specific comment is correct; just because a country has outperformed in the past does not mean it will continue to do so. No one country will always deliver the best performance. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.g)
Which of the items in Exhibit 1 is least accurate?
Low correlations between markets reduce volatility, but do not directly affect the level of expected return. The inclusion of emerging markets should result in higher expected returns due to their higher expected economic growth, not because they have low correlations with developed markets. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.g)
Which of Cardoza’s assertions about using relative value multiples is least accurate? | | C)
| All of Cardoza’s assertions are true. |
|
Although relative value multiples are easy to calculate, the fact that historical data is used is a disadvantage. Historical data may not be relevant to a company’s future growth prospects. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.g)
All of the following typify emerging market risks EXCEPT: A)
| closed-end mutual fund returns can fluctuate due to changes in investor supply and demand for these instruments. |
| B)
| local governments may restrict the ability to move capital from the country. |
| C)
| free float is low because reverse splits to bolster per share prices occur on a regular basis. |
|
The proportion of stock publicly traded (free float) is frequently low because the government is often the primary owner of most of a company’s stock. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.j)
Which of the following statements regarding the correlation between stock returns and currency movements is CORRECT? A)
| Emerging markets have a negative correlation between local market returns and currency movements. |
| B)
| Both developed and emerging markets have been shown to have a positive correlation between local market returns and U.S. currency movements. |
| C)
| Developed markets have a negative correlation between local market returns and currency movements. |
|
In developed countries, the correlation between local market returns and currency movements is usually negative, whereas in emerging markets, the local market returns and currency returns are usually positively correlated. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.j)
Which of the following statements concerning international investing and global investing is least accurate? A)
| Global investing implies diversification across industries as well as countries. |
| B)
| International investing is principally concerned with diversification across countries. |
| C)
| There is no difference between global and international investing. |
|
International investing is principally concerned with diversification across countries, while global investing diversifies across industries as well as countries. However, there is no assurance that international diversification will be achieved under a global investing strategy—it is possible that the fund manager may decide to commit a disproportionate share of assets to a small set of countries, or even entirely to the investor’s home country. (Study Session 8, LOS 22.i) |
|