- UID
- 223227
- 帖子
- 654
- 主题
- 170
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
32#
发表于 2012-3-27 13:57
| 只看该作者
United Corporation and Intrepid Company are similar firms operating in the same industry. United follows U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and Intrepid follows International Financial Reporting Standards. At the end of last year, Intrepid had a higher inventory turnover ratio than United. Are the following plausible explanations for the difference?
Explanation #1 – United accounts for its inventory using the first-in, first-out method and Intrepid uses the last-in, first-out method.
Explanation #2 – United recognized an upward valuation of inventory that had been previously written down. Intrepid does not revalue its inventory upward. | Explanation #1 | Explanation #2 |
While the LIFO firm will typically report lower average inventory (higher inventory turnover), Intrepid cannot be a LIFO firm because LIFO is not permitted under IFRS. An upward revaluation of inventory would lower the inventory turnover ratio; however, United cannot revalue its inventory upward because it follows U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP prohibits upward inventory revaluations (except in very limited circumstances which are beyond the scope of the Level I exam). |
|