- UID
- 223346
- 帖子
- 483
- 主题
- 49
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-12
|
Mark Washington, CFA, is an analyst with BIC, a Bermuda-based investment company that does business primarily in the U.S. and Canada. BIC has approximately $200 million of assets under management, the bulk of which is invested in U.S. equities. BIC has outperformed its target benchmark for eight of the past ten years, and has consistently been in the top quartile of performance when compared with its peer investment companies. Washington is a part of the Liability Management group that is responsible for hedging the equity portfolios under management. The Liability Management group has been authorized to use calls or puts on the underlying equities in the portfolio when appropriate, in order to minimize their exposure to market volatility. They also may utilize an options strategy in order to generate additional returns. One year ago, BIC analysts predicted that the U.S. equity market would most likely experience a slight downturn due to inflationary pressures. The analysts forecast a decrease in equity values of between 3 to 5% over the upcoming year and one-half. Based upon that prediction, the Liability Management group was instructed to utilize calls and puts to construct a delta-neutral portfolio. Washington immediately established option positions that he believed would hedge the underlying portfolio against the impending market decline.
As predicted, the U.S. equity markets did indeed experience a downturn of approximately 4% over a twelve-month period. However, portfolio performance for BIC during those twelve months was disappointing. The performance of the BIC portfolio lagged that of its peer group by nearly 10%. Upper management believes that a major factor in the portfolio’s underperformance was the option strategy utilized by Washington and the Liability Management group. Management has decided that the Liability Management group did not properly execute a delta-neutral strategy. Washington and his group have been told to review their options strategy to determine why the hedged portfolio did not perform as expected. Washington has decided to undertake a review of the most basic option concepts, and explore such elementary topics as option valuation, an option’s delta, and the expected performance of options under varying scenarios. He is going to examine all facets of a delta-neutral portfolio: how to construct one, how to determine the expected results, and when to use one. Management has given Washington and his group one week to immerse themselves in options theory, review the basic concepts, and then to present their findings as to why the portfolio did not perform as expected. Which of the following best explains a delta-neutral portfolio? A delta-neutral portfolio is perfectly hedged against: A)
| small price decreases in the underlying asset. |
| B)
| all price changes in the underlying asset. |
| C)
| small price changes in the underlying asset. |
|
A delta-neutral portfolio is perfectly hedged against small price changes in the underlying asset. This is true both for price increases and decreases. That is, the portfolio value will not change significantly if the asset price changes by a small amount. However, large changes in the underlying will cause the hedge to become imperfect. This means that overall portfolio value can change by a significant amount if the price change in the underlying asset is large. (Study Session 17, LOS 56.e)
After discussing the concept of a delta-neutral portfolio, Washington determines that he needs to further explain the concept of delta. Washington draws the payoff diagram for an option as a function of the underlying stock price. Using this diagram, how is delta interpreted? Delta is the: A)
| slope in the option price diagram. |
| B)
| curvature of the option price graph. |
| C)
| level in the option price diagram. |
|
Delta is the change in the option price for a given instantaneous change in the stock price. The change is equal to the slope of the option price diagram. (Study Session 17, LOS 56.e)
Washington considers a put option that has a delta of −0.65. If the price of the underlying asset decreases by $6, then which of the following is the best estimate of the change in option price?
The estimated change in the price of the option is:
Change in asset price × delta = −$6 × (−0.65) = $3.90
(Study Session 17, LOS 56.e)
Washington is trying to determine the value of a call option. When the slope of the at expiration curve is close to zero, the call option is:
When a call option is deep out-of-the-money, the slope of the at expiration curve is close to zero, which means the delta will be close to zero. (Study Session 17, LOS 56.e)
BIC owns 51,750 shares of Smith & Oates. The shares are currently priced at $69. A call option on Smith & Oates with a strike price of $70 is selling at $3.50, and has a delta of 0.69 What is the number of call options necessary to create a delta-neutral hedge?
The number of call options necessary to delta hedge is = 51,750 / 0.69 = 75,000 options or 750 option contracts, each covering 100 shares. Since these are call options, the options should be sold short. (Study Session 17, LOS 56.e)
Which of the following statements regarding the goal of a delta-neutral portfolio is most accurate? One example of a delta-neutral portfolio is to combine a: A)
| long position in a stock with a short position in a call option so that the value of the portfolio changes with changes in the value of the stock. |
| B)
| long position in a stock with a short position in call options so that the value of the portfolio does not change with changes in the value of the stock. |
| C)
| long position in a stock with a long position in call options so that the value of the portfolio does not change with changes in the value of the stock. |
|
A delta-neutral portfolio can be created with any of the following combinations: long stock and short calls, long stock and long puts, short stock and long calls, and short stock and short puts. (Study Session 17, LOS 56.e) |
|