Question 8 - #9821
Part 1) Your answer: B was incorrect. The correct answer was D) Baker’s statement is correct and Bigelow’s statement is incorrect. Since the futures contract has 184 days to expiration and the next coupon payment on the T-note is also 184 days away, the coupon will be received on the last day of the contract. Thus, the futures value using the cash and carry model will be the spot price plus interest on borrowing the money to buy the note minus interest received (in this case, the coupon payment). The interest rate Baker calculates for the “carry” will be the average of the 12 percent borrowing rate and 4 percent lending rate, or 8 percent. Since the coupon payment received will equal one-half of the 8.5% coupon rate on the note, we calculate: 100 x (1 + 0.08)184 / 365 - 4.25 = 99.7059 Baker’s statement is correct. Bigelow’s statement is incorrect on many levels, including the fact that a short seller does not receive coupon payments. Part 2) Your answer: B was correct! The arbitrage that Baker and Bigelow executed is a classic cash and carry arbitrage because the futures contract was trading above its fair value. The idea behind a cash and carry arbitrage is to make a profit on a futures contract that is trading over its fair value by buying the underlying asset with borrowed money and then selling the overpriced futures contract. The underlying asset can then be delivered against the short futures contract when the future expires. When a Treasury futures contract is trading over its fair value, the cost of buying the underlying asset (including interest charges on the borrowed funds less interest received on the Treasury security) will be more than made up for by the price received on the sale of the futures contract. Part 3) Your answer: B was incorrect. The correct answer was C) Baker’s statement is correct and Bigelow’s statement is correct. Using the cash and carry model and the risk arbitrage desk’s borrowing rate of 12 percent, the calculation of the higher band is: 100 x (1 + 0.12)184 / 365 - 4.25 = 101.6294 Using the reverse cash and carry model and the bank’s lending rate of 4 percent, the calculation of the lower band is: 100 x (1 + 0.040)184 / 365 - 4.25 - 0.0000 = 97.7468. Baker’s statement is correct and Bigelow’s statement is correct. Part 4) Your answer: B was incorrect. The correct answer was A) 93.1831. If the cheapest-to-deliver note has a conversion factor of 1.07, the no-arbitrage futures price is: (99.7059 / 1.07) = 93.1831. Part 5) Your answer: B was correct! Since the futures are overpriced relative to the spot price, we calculate profit per contract as a cash and carry arbitrage relative to the upper bound: 103 - [100 x (1 + 0.12)184 / 365 - 4.25] = 1.371 Since Baker will make 1.371 points on each contract, and a Treasury future has a face value of $100,000, Baker expects to make $1,371 on each contract she trades. Part 6) Your answer: B was incorrect. The correct answer was C) The long position has the advantage in the arbitrage play. An arbitrage play involving the cheapest-to-deliver bond may not be risk free since the cheapest-to-deliver bond may change during the life of the contract. This provides an advantage to the short (not the long) since the short position makes the decision about which bond to deliver.
|