Has anyone ever heard of getting an investigation notice regarding a similarity analysis and “unusual similarities” between test answer sheets? Is this common?
Ok, and what if you didn’t? I can’t seem to find a relevant thread as most exam related PCP incidents seem to be involving proctor’s writing up candidates for looking at other papers, or written past the time limit… this is absolute non-sense.
mpr4437 Wrote:
——————————————————-
Ok, and what if you didn’t? I can’t seem to find a
relevant thread as most exam related PCP incidents
seem to be involving proctor’s writing up
candidates for looking at other papers, or written
past the time limit… this is absolute non-sense.
This is based on statistical analysis. They know who was sitting around you and they have tools to flag any very low probability events/ patterns. The CFAI is very advanced when it comes to this there are papers published explaining the models if you are interested check out Google Scholar ( google: Detecting cheating in multiple choice tests)
If you’re involved in one of those, don’t even think about fighting it, the math is irrefutable.
I don’t know how CFAI defines “similar”. If two answer sheets of neighbouring candidates are almost identical, it is of course because one of them cheated.
发表于 2013-4-28 12:52
| 
