Which of the following is NOT a conclusion that could be derived from plotting a manager's value-added returns relative to the benchmark on a quality control chart? A) | If returns are consistently above the horizontal axis this could indicate superior performance on the part of the manager under review. |
| B) | The chart can be used to determine whether or not the potential superior performance is statistically significant. |
| C) | If value added returns are distributed randomly around the horizontal axis then managers added value returns are more or less random. |
| D) | If returns are consistently below the horizontal axis this could indicate underperformance on the part of the manager under review. |
|
Answer and Explanation
In order to determine statistical significance or otherwise, confidence intervals will need to be constructed using the standard deviation of the returns, this is not observable from plotting the manager's value added returns alone and would need to be separately calculated. All the other conclusions are correct.
|