A common pitfall in interpreting earnings yields in valuation is:
| ||
| ||
|
A common pitfall is look-ahead bias, wherein the analyst uses information that was not available to the investor when calculating the earnings yield.
A common justification for using earnings yields in valuation is that:
| ||
| ||
|
Negative earnings render P/E ratios meaningless. In such cases, it is common to use normalized earnings per share (EPS) and/or restate the ratio as the earnings yield or E/P because price is never negative. Price to earnings (P/E) ranking can then proceed as usual.
The observation that negative price to earnings (P/E) ratios are meaningless and prices are never negative is used to justify which valuation approach?
| ||
| ||
|
The observation is used to justify the earnings yield approach. Negative P/E ratios are meaningless. In such cases, it is common to use normalized earnings per share (EPS) and/or restate the ratio as the earnings yield or E/P because price is never negative. Price to earnings (P/E) ranking can then proceed as usual.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |