![Board logo](images/default/logo.gif)
标题: Reading 44: Private Company Valuation-LOS e 习题精选 [打印本页]
作者: 土豆妮 时间: 2010-4-20 11:22 标题: [2010]Session 12-Reading 44: Private Company Valuation-LOS e 习题精选
Session 12: Equity Investments: Valuation Models
Reading 44: Private Company Valuation
LOS e: Demonstrate the adjustments required to estimate the normalized earnings and/or cash flow for a private company, from the prespective of either a strategic or nonstrategic (financial) buyer, and explain cash flow estimation issues.
Given the following figures, calculate the normalized EBITDA for a financial and strategic buyer.
Reported EBITDA |
$4,500,000 |
Current Executive Compensation |
$700,000 |
Market-Based Executive Compensation |
$620,000 |
Current SG&A expenses |
$6,300,000 |
SG&A expenses after synergistic savings |
$5,600,000 |
Current Lease Rate |
$300,000 |
Market-Based Lease Rate |
$390,000 |
The normalized EBITDA for each type of buyer is:
|
Financial Buyer |
Strategic Buyer |
Both strategic and financial buyers will attempt to reduce executive compensation to market levels by $80,000 ($700,000 ? $620,000). They will also have to pay a higher lease rate of $90,000 ($390,000 ? $300,000). So the adjustment for both buyers to generate normalized EBITDA is $4,500,000 + $80,000 ? $90,000 = $4,490,000.
However, only a strategic buyer will be able to realize synergistic savings of $700,000 ($6,300,000 ? $5,600,000). So normalized EBITDA for a strategic buyer is $5,190,000 and for a financial buyer it is $4,490,000.
作者: 土豆妮 时间: 2010-4-20 11:22
Given the following figures, calculate the FCFF. Assume the earnings and expenses are normalized and that capital expenditures will cover depreciation plus 3 percent of the firm’s incremental revenues.
Current Revenues |
$30,000,000 |
Revenue growth |
6% |
Gross profit margin |
20% |
Depreciation expense as a percent of sales |
1% |
Working capital as a percent of sales |
15% |
SG&A expenses |
$3,800,000 |
Tax rate |
30% |
The answer is calculated as follows:
Pro forma Income Statement |
|
Revenues |
$31,800,000 |
Cost of Goods Sold |
$25,440,000 |
Gross Profit |
$6,360,000 |
SG&A Expenses |
$3,800,000 |
Pro forma EBITDA |
$2,560,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |
$318,000 |
Pro forma EBIT |
$2,242,000 |
Pro forma taxes on EBIT |
$672,600 |
Operating income after tax |
$1,569,400 |
|
|
Adjustments to obtain FCFF |
|
Plus: Depreciation and amortization |
$318,000 |
Minus: Capital expenditures |
$372,000 |
Minus: Increase in working capital |
$270,000 |
FCFF |
$1,245,400 |
The following provides a line by line explanation for the above calculations.
Pro forma Income Statement |
Explanation |
Revenues |
Current revenues times the growth rate: $30,000,000 × (1.06) |
Cost of Goods Sold |
Revenues times one minus the gross profit margin: $31,800,000 × (1 ? 0.20) |
Gross Profit |
Revenues times the gross profit margin: $31,800,000 × 0.20 |
SG&A Expenses |
Given in the question |
Pro forma EBITDA |
Gross Profit minus SG&A expenses: $6,360,000 ? $3,800,000 |
Depreciation and amortization |
Revenues times the given depreciation expense: $31,800,000 × 0.01 |
Pro forma EBIT |
EBITDA minus depreciation and amortization: $2,560,000 ? $318,000 |
Pro forma taxes on EBIT |
EBIT times tax rate: $2,242,000 × 0.30 |
Operating income after tax |
EBIT minus taxes: $2,242,000 ? $672,600 |
|
|
Adjustments to obtain FCFF |
|
Plus: Depreciation and amort. |
Add back noncash charges from above |
Minus: Capital expenditures |
Expenditures cover depreciation and increase with revenues: $318,000 + (0.03 × $31,800,000 ? $30,000,000) |
Minus: Increase in working capital |
The working capital will increase as revenues increase: (0.15 × $31,800,000 ? $30,000,000) |
FCFF |
Operating income net of the adjustments above |
作者: 土豆妮 时间: 2010-4-20 11:22
Which of the following best describes the use of FCFF and FCFE when used in private firm valuation?
A) |
FCFF is usually favored if the firm is going to change its capital structure because the WACC is less sensitive to leverage changes than the cost of equity. | |
B) |
FCFE is usually favored if the firm is going to change its capital structure because the equityholders are usually the investors requesting the valuation. | |
C) |
FCFE is usually favored if the firm is going to change its capital structure because the cost of equity is less sensitive to leverage changes than the WACC. | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) can be used to value the firm as a whole and free cash flow to equity (FCFE) can be used for equity. FCFF is usually favored if the firm is going to significantly change its capital structure. The reason is that the discount rate used for FCFF valuation, the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is less sensitive to leverage changes than the discount rate used for FCFE valuation, the cost of equity. Thus, the FCFF valuation will not vary as much as the FCFE valuation.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |