Board logo

标题: L1平时做题都是对六十几%,这样子能过么? [打印本页]

作者: 妞妞的宝贝猪    时间: 2010-6-7 17:03     标题: L1平时做题都是对六十几%,这样子能过么?

平时做题很稳定, 几乎都是对六十几%

实战感觉和平时也差不多。。。不知道能不能过。


作者: xiaomaiwd    时间: 2010-6-7 17:10

你觉得世界1%能考多少分?

他们考100,你就得超常发挥.他们考90,你是够了


作者: 妞妞的宝贝猪    时间: 2010-6-7 18:57

这么悲剧。。。


作者: 妞妞的宝贝猪    时间: 2010-6-7 18:58

这么悲剧。。。


作者: lingvisten    时间: 2010-6-7 20:48

QUOTE:
以下是引用xiaomaiwd在2010-6-7 17:10:00的发言:

你觉得世界1%能考多少分?

他们考100,你就得超常发挥.他们考90,你是够了

這是舊方法,現在不是這樣的。
參考一下﹕ http://financialrounds.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-do-they-determine-passing-score-on.html
作者: xiaomaiwd    时间: 2010-6-7 20:56

楼上的地址打不开呀

你给贴出来说说被

不都说这么算么1%的70%


作者: lingvisten    时间: 2010-6-7 21:07

現在他們用 "angoff method"
由一班 cfa專家來,對每一道題下判斷,判斷一個 「剛好合格的人」能不能答對
然後把總分加起來,這個「剛好合格的人」能答對的總題數,就是合格分數。

簡單點說,就是他們說了算。
作者: ak56    时间: 2010-6-7 21:33

难说,一般平时答对率70%才算有把握。毕竟在考试中,发挥是要打折扣的。
作者: ak56    时间: 2010-6-7 21:35

QUOTE:
以下是引用lingvisten在2010-6-7 21:07:00的发言:
現在他們用 "angoff method" 由一班 cfa專家來,對每一道題下判斷,判斷一個 「剛好合格的人」能不能答對然後把總分加起來,這個「剛好合格的人」能答對的總題數,就是合格分數。 簡單點說,就是他們說了算。

这个方法也挺不错的,有点像二级里的economist survey,但缺点CFAI应该很清楚。


作者: yangfanripple    时间: 2010-6-7 22:18

看总数的啊 不是说FSA和ETHIC这两部分比较重要的吗

我是听说,70%以上一般来说可以过的~


作者: 妞妞的宝贝猪    时间: 2010-6-8 08:26

Since the CFA June exams are now done, there's a lot of concern as to how CFAI determines a passing score. So, here's a breakdown for Levels 1 and 2:

In the past CFAI used a strictly numeric method of calculating the pass rate - they'd take 70% of the 95th percentile score. So, back in the day, the minimum passing score would be no greater than 70%, and would typically be even less.

Now, their scoring system has a significant subjective component to it. Here's how it works: CFA Institute brings a number of charterholders that they call "Standard Setters" to Charlotte sometime in June. These people then discuss what they think a "minimally qualified" candidate should know (for L1 and L2). CFAI is pretty opaque as to what this actually means, but my understanding is that they look at the exams and come up with "the score".

They refer to what's know as the "Angoff method". If they apply this method in its strictest sense, this would involve each standard setter examining each question and making a subjective determination as to what percentage of well-qualified candidates would answer correctly on the question. For each question, the standard-setters percentages are averaged to get a percentage for that question. The individual question-percentages are then summed to get the passing score (in terms of number of correct answers needed).

So theoretically, the minimum passing score could be above 70%. But according to the scuttlebut on analyst forum, the minimum has likely been below 70% in each year. So, my gut reaction is that a 70% would get it done, and even slightly less.

But that's just a guess on my part.

Note: If you're new to Financial Rounds, check out our FAQ. If you want to receive updates, either sign up for email updates on the right sidebar, or add our RSS feed to your feed reader.

 

我把上面那个兄台给的地址里面那的贴出来


作者: largerlife    时间: 2010-6-8 15:03

这个方法第一次听说  但那样不是要评估每一题的权重?


作者: tommyyxh    时间: 2010-6-8 15:07

你能考到75% 一般没问题,肯定能过!






欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2