When designing policies and procedures to implement the CFA Institute Research Objectivity Standards, all of the following are objectives, EXCEPT:
| ||
| ||
|
While important, referencing CFA Institute membership in a dignified and judicious manner is not an objective of the Research Objectivity Standards.
Bill Williams, CFA, has been tasked by his firm, Null Investments, to ensure that the firm’s policies and procedures allow its research department to maintain its independence and objectivity. One of the objectives Williams has outlined for Null’s policies and procedures is that they should promote the establishment of a non-governmental regulatory body. This body will be responsible for creating standards that assure that research firms produce independent and objective research. Is this objective for Null’s policies and procedures consistent with the objectives of the CFA Institute Research Objectivity Standards (ROS)?
| ||
| ||
|
Among the objectives of the CFA Institute Research Objectivity Standards is the goal of promoting industry self-regulation through the voluntary adoption of standards that promote and reward independent and objective research.
In a meeting with her firm’s research director, Janice Mitchell, a proponent of the CFA Institute Research Objectivity Standards (ROS), stated that two of the key objectives of the ROS were to:
Determine whether Mitchell is correct or incorrect with regard to her statements about the objectives of the ROS.
Objective 1 | Objective 2 |
| |||||
| |||||
|
Mitchell’s first statement is correct. Objectives of the CFA Institute Research Objectivity Standards include assisting in full, fair, meaningful, and specific disclosure of potential and actual conflicts of interest. Mitchell’s second statement is incorrect. The ROS do not intend to create any sort of reporting to CFA Institute on the research practices of any firm.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |