When comparing companies that hold equity investments in other corporations, which of the following statements is most accurate? All else being equal, leverage measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear:
| ||
| ||
|
All else being equal, leverage measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear more favorable than those for a comparable firm using consolidation, and less favorable than those for a comparable firm using the equity method. This is because the choice of accounting method will affect the value of the liabilities on the balance sheet, while the level of book equity remains the same.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011-3-9 15:29:19编辑过]
When comparing companies that hold equity investments in other corporations, which of the following statements is most accurate? All else being equal, net profit margin measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear:
| ||
| ||
|
All else being equal, net profit margin measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear more favorable than those for a comparable firm using consolidation, and less favorable than those for a comparable firm using the equity method. This is because the choice of accounting method will affect the level of sales, while the level of net income remains the same.
When comparing companies that hold equity investments in other corporations, which of the following statements is most accurate? All else being equal, return on asset measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear:
| ||
| ||
|
All else being equal, return on asset measures for a firm using proportionate consolidation will appear more favorable than those for a comparable firm using consolidation, and less favorable than those for a comparable firm using the equity method. This is because the choice of accounting method will affect the level of book assets, while the level of net income remains the same.
Which of the following methods of accounting for investments will reflect the highest assets and liabilities on a company’s balance sheet?
| ||
| ||
|
The consolidation method will reflect the highest assets and liabilities. The equity method would reflect the lowest.
Which of the following methods of accounting for investments will reflect the highest net income on a company’s income statement?
| ||
| ||
|
Both methods will report the same net income.
A company reports an intercorporate investment using the acquistion method. Which of the following statements is most accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
The equity method will provide the most favorable results, while the acquistion method will provide the least favorable results.
Milburne Company purchased 1,000 shares of Marino Co. for $20 per share on January 1. By December 31, shares of Marino were trading at $15 per share in the open market. Marino Co. has 100,000 shares outstanding with a dividend yield of 2% at year end. Milburne plans to hold the shares of Marino for longer-term investment and liquidity purposes. The impact of the Marino holding on the Milburne income statement is:
| ||
| ||
|
These securities are to be classified as available for sale and hence, all unrealized gains and losses are posted to a securities valuation reserve on the balance sheet. Hence, the only income statement impact is the $300 dividend = 0.02 × $15 × 1,000.
Milburne Company purchased 1,000 shares of Marino Co. for $20 per share on January 1. By December 31, shares of Marino were trading at $15 per share in the open market. Marino Co. has 100,000 shares outstanding with a dividend yield of 2% at year end. Milburne plans to hold the shares of Marino for near-term trading purposes. The impact of the Marino holding on the Milburne income statement is:
| ||
| ||
|
Since these securities are to be classified as trading securities, both the dividend received and the unrealized loss are posted to the income statement. The dividend is computed as 0.02 × $15 × 1,000 = $300 whereas the unrealized loss is $5,000 = ($15 - $20) × 1,000. The net income statement impact is $300 - $5,000 = -$4,700.
On December 31, 2008 Company P invests $5,000 in Company S in exchange for 25% of the company. During 2009, Company S earns $2,000 and pays a dividend of $500. If Company P uses the equity method of accounting, what values will be reported on the balance sheet and income statement? How much cash will be recognized from the investment?
Balance Sheet | Income Statement | Cash |
| |||||
| |||||
|
The carrying value on the balance sheet is $5,375, the income statement will show $500 of income, and the cash recognized is equal to the dividend of $125. At the end of 2008, the carrying value of Company S on Company P’s balance sheet will be ($5,000 original investment + $500 proportional share of Company S earnings – $125 dividend received = $5,375).
Using the equity method, for 2008, Company P will:
Fiduciary Investors held two portfolios of marketable equity securities:
$50 million in Portfolio A was accounted for as available-for-sale.
$50 million in Portfolio B was accounted for as trading securities.
Assume that Fiduciary reclassified securities ($10 million carrying value, $8 million market value) from Portfolio B into Portfolio A under U.S. GAAP. If no previous write downs were made, Fiduciary must:
| ||
| ||
|
U.S. GAAP allows investment managers some latitude in reclassifying investment assets from “trading” to “available-for-sale.” Unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the income statement. IFRS severely restricts reclassification out of the held-for-trading category.
The Anderson Company acquired 100,000 shares of the Birschbach Company on January 1, 2000, at $25 per share. The market price of a share of Birschbach stock on December 31, 2000, was $35 per share. During 2000, Birschbach paid dividends of $1.50 per share and had earnings of $2.50 per share.
If Anderson Company accounts for the Birschbach Company shares using the equity method, the carrying amount of these shares on Anderson's balance sheet at the end of 2000 is:
| ||
| ||
|
Under the equity method market value is ignored so the carrying value of the shares is the original investment + proportional share of earnings ? dividend received.
[(100,000)($25)] + [(100,000)($2.50 ? 1.50)] = $2,600,000
| ||
| ||
|
Under the available-for-sale accounting method unrealized gains and losses are not recognized on the income statement so the only impact on the income statement is the dividend received:
(100,000 shares)($1.50 per share) = $150,000
On December 15, 2009, the Zeisler Company faces a financial crisis. Zeisler’s industry has gone into recession and net income has declined to nearly zero. Jeremiah Welch, the company’s CFO, is extremely concerned that, when the final figures for 2009 come in, the poor operating results will throw the firm into violation of its debt covenants, which specify that it must meet a certain return on assets (ROA) and not exceed a certain debt-to-asset ratio. A violation of either covenant would trigger a provision in the lending agreement allowing lenders to put Zeisler’s debt back to the firm and likely force Zeisler into bankruptcy.
With only two weeks before the close of the firm’s fiscal year on December 31, there is no way to avoid bankruptcy through improved operations. Welch calls an emergency meeting with Olivia Dupree, the firm’s controller, to come up with a plan of action to keep Zeisler out of bankruptcy. He explains to Dupree that they need to increase Zeigler’s reported ROA and reduce its reported debt-to-assets ratio relative to the numbers that would otherwise be reported for 2009.
Dupree suggests that Zeisler’s equity investments might be useful in staving off bankruptcy. Zeisler acquired 100,000 shares of the Market Square Corporation on January 1, 2009, at $25 per share. Market Square paid dividends during 2009 of $1.50 per share and was expected to have earnings for 2009 of $2.50 per share. Zeisler also holds 250,000 shares of General Nuclear, purchased for $72 per share. General Nuclear has no dividends and is expected to report a loss for 2009. Both securities are classified on the financial statements as available-for-sale.
Dupree added that Zeisler also holds several million dollars of Market Square’s debt securities, classified as a held-to-maturity investment. The holding in Market Square represents a small fraction of Zeisler’s total fixed-income investments, all of which are also classified as held-to-maturity. The investment in Market Square’s debt differs significantly from Zeisler’s other investments in fixed-income securities in that Market Square’s debt is trading slightly above Zeisler’s cost while Zeisler’s other fixed-income investments are all trading significantly below Zeisler’s cost because of a general increase in market interest rates. Welch points out, however, that even if the firm were to sell all its marketable securities, the proceeds would not be sufficient to pay off the debt and avert bankruptcy.
Dupree left the meeting with Welch for a moment to check the stock market. She found that Market Square was trading at $35 per share and General Nuclear was at $43. This new information gave Dupree an idea.
Dupree suggested to Welch, “We could reclassify our equity investment in Market Square as trading before year-end. That will help raise our ROA for this year.” Welch pointed out that a reclassification of the equity investment from available-for-sale to trading would reduce Zeisler’s reported net income because the firm would be required to stop including the dividends it receives from Market Square in net income.
Welch suggested that, instead of reclassifying Market Square’s equity, they sell Market Square’s debt. That would reduce Zeisler’s debt-to-assets ratio because the unrealized gain in the market value of the Market Square debt would be realized when the security was sold. Dupree added that the firm could also liquidate the General Nuclear investment to raise cash without affecting the firm’s reported ROA for 2009. Welch and Dupree decided to liquidate the two assets to help improve the firm’s financial position.
What is the investment income that Zeisler Company will report for the year 2009 on its investment in Market Square Corporation shares if it continues to account for the shares as an available-for-sale investment?
| ||
| ||
|
The investment income for available-for-sale securities includes dividends, interest, and realized gains. In this case, the investment income from Market Square Corporation would be the dividends it paid to the number of shares Zeisler owns:
100,000 shares × $1.50 per share = $150,000. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
| ||
| ||
|
Trading securities are carried at fair market value: 100,000 shares × $35 per share = $3,500,000. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
| ||
| ||
|
Reclassifying a security from available-for-sale to trading requires unrealized gains and losses to be recognized in income. Since Zeisler’s investment in General Nuclear has an unrealized loss, net income would be reduced. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
| ||
| ||
|
Welch’s statement is incorrect because dividends and interest are recognized as income both when the securities are classified as trading and when they are classified as available-for-sale. Dupree’s statement is correct. Reclassifying the securities from available-for-sale to trading will significantly raise Zeisler’s near-zero net income by allowing Zeisler to recognize the unrealized gain in income when the security is reclassified. It will have no material effect on asset value because the shares will be carried at fair market value as trading securities and were already carried at fair market value (with the net unrealized gain in equity) as available-for-sale securities. Even though it may appear that equity would decline by the amount of the unrealized gain if the securities were reclassified, the unrealized gain will flow through income in 2009 and thus return to equity. Consequently, reclassifying the equity securities of Market Square would help increase Zeisler’s ROA by raising net income and having little effect on assets. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
| ||
| ||
|
Under the equity method the market value of the stock is ignored but the proportionate share of the earnings are added to the original investment and the proportionate share of the dividends are subtracted from the earnings. Hence, we have the original investment + (earnings ? dividends) = total value of the investment. [(100,000 shares)($25)] + [(100,000 shares)($2.50 earnings ? 1.50 dividend)] = $2,600,000. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
| ||
| ||
|
Welch’s statement is incorrect because accounting standards require a firm that sells a held-to-maturity security before maturity to carry its remaining held-to-maturity securities at market value instead of cost. Since the Market Square debt is the only fixed-income investment trading above Zeisler’s cost, and it represents only a small part of Zeisler’s total fixed-income portfolio, the net effect of selling the Market Square debt would be to reduce assets (not raise them) because it would require Zeisler to mark down all its other fixed-income investments. A decline in assets would effectively increase the debt to assets ratio. Dupree’s statement is also incorrect. The investment in General Nuclear would be carried on the books at fair market value, with the unrealized loss in equity. Selling the asset and converting it to cash would not materially affect total assets. However, selling the General Nuclear shares would reduce net income because the realized loss would have to be recognized in income. Thus, the sale would reduce reported ROA. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
On January 9, 2006, Company X paid $2,000,000 for 100,000 shares of stock in Company S. Originally the company intended on holding the securities for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, the stocks were valued at $2,200,000. In 2006, Company S had earnings per share of $0.90 and paid dividends per share of $0.20. In late December 2006, the company decided to place the securities in their active marketable securities portfolio.
What is the impact of this change in status on the value of the assets of Company X?
| ||
| ||
|
The stocks were classified as debt and equity securities available for sale, but now they will be classified as debt and equity trading securities. However, although it will affect net income, the change in status will not impact the reported value of the assets. According to SFAS 115, securities transferred from available-for-sale to trading securities are transferred at fair market value and unrealized gains or losses would be included in income.
| ||
| ||
|
The stocks were classified as debt and equity securities available for sale, but now they will be classified as debt and equity trading securities. The gain would have been reported in the securities valuation account in the equity section and not on the income statement, but now will be reported as income.
Which of the following statements about proportionate consolidation and the equity method is least accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
The equity balance of the investor will remain unchanged irrespective of whether or not the equity method or proportionate consolidation is employed.
Which of the following statements about proportionate consolidation is CORRECT?
| ||
| ||
|
The proportionate consolidation method is most appropriate when two firms have entered into a joint venture relationship but the investor accounts for the investment under the equity method because it owns between 20 and 50% of the outstanding shares of the JV. The proportionate consolidation method is used by analysts to better reflect the true economic linkage between the JV and the investor firm. The equity method provides nothing more than a "one-line" consolidation.
Joseph Haggs, CFA, is an analyst working for Garvess Jones, a large publicly traded investment-baking firm. Haggs covers the Internet sector. Recently, one of the more successful companies Haggs covers, Simpson Corporation, made an aggressive move to acquire another Internet company, Bailey Corporation (BC). BC is a company specializing in graphics and animation on the World Wide Web and has 1,000,000 shares outstanding. Simpson also holds minimal investments in other technology companies both public and private. In 1999 Simpson saw an opportunity to substantially increase its share in BC. Simpson feels that their sophisticated animation can greatly improve Simpson's market share and sees an acquisition as an opportunity to expand their business. The relevant financial data are in the following tables.
Bailey Corporation | |||
Selected Financial Data, Years Ended December 31 | |||
(in Thousands) | |||
Item |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Sales |
$50,000 |
$60,000 |
$70,000 |
Less: cost of goods sold (COGS) |
37,000 |
43,700 |
47,250 |
Earnings before interest & taxes (EBIT) |
13,000 |
16,300 |
22,750 |
Less: Interest |
10,000 |
13,000 |
19,000 |
EBT |
3,000 |
3,300 |
3,750 |
Less: Taxes |
1,000 |
1,100 |
1,250 |
Net Income |
$2,000 |
$2,200 |
$2,500 |
Dividends Paid |
$1,000 |
$1,200 |
$1,500 |
Total Shares Outstanding |
1,000,000 |
Simpson’s Purchase Transactions in BC’s Stock | |||
Date |
January 1, 1998 |
January 1, 1999 |
January 1, 2000 |
Number of Shares |
10,000 |
290,000 |
700,000 |
Price per Share |
10 |
11 |
15 |
Because this is the largest acquisition in Simpson's history, Mr. Haggs' supervisor has asked him to prepare a report for Garvess Jones' clients detailing the affects of the acquisition on Simpson's financial statements.
Haggs wonders which accounting method Simpson uses to calculate the book value of the BC investment for the year ending December 31, 1999. Which is the correct method?
| ||
| ||
|
When a company owns an influential but non-controlling interest in another company, commonly 20-50%, it must account for it under the equity method.
| ||
| ||
|
When a company owns a non-influential and non-controlling interest in another company the investment must be carried at cost. Simpson must carry its BC investment at cost for 1998.
| ||
| ||
|
When a company's interest in another exceeds 50% it is considered to have controlling interest and must consolidate the financial statements.
| ||
| ||
|
Simpson paid a total of $?3,190,000 (290,000 shares × $11) however, they also received a dividend from BC of $360,000. For 1999 Bailey Corporation is paying $1.20 in dividends per share (1,200,000 / 1,000,000). As of December 1999, Simpson has purchased 300,000 shares of BC (= 290,000 + 10,000). So dividends received is 300,000 × $1.20 = $360,000. This will make the total cash flow for the year $?2,830,000.
Assume that on the balance sheet date shown below TME Corporation acquires 70% of Abcor, Inc. common stock for $25,000 in cash.
Pre-acquisition Balance Sheets
December 31, 2001
TME Corp.
Abcor, Inc.
Current assets
$80,000
$38,000
Other assets
28,000
15,000
Total assets
$108,000
$53,000
Current liabilities
$60,000
$32,000
Common stock
15,000
14,000
Retained earnings
33,000
7,000
Total liabilities and equity
$108,000
$53,000
What will be the post-acquisition current ratio, using both the acquistion method and the equity method, respectively, for TME? The choices below represent Acquisition and Equity, respectively.
| ||
| ||
|
With the acquisition method: The current assets are ($80,000 + $38,000 - $25,000) = $93,000. The current liabilities are ($60,000 + $32,000) = $92,000. The current ratio is $93,000/$92,000 = 1.01. With the equity method: The current assets are ($80,000 - $25,000) = $55,000. The current liabilities are $60,000. The current ratio is $55,000/$60,000 = 0.92.
| ||
| ||
|
Using the acquisition basis of accounting, the post-acquisition level of the current assets is the amount of the current assets prior to acquisition minus the amount of cash used for the acquisition. ($80,000 + 38,000 – 25,000) = $93,000.
| ||
| ||
|
Since only 70% of Abcor was purchased by TME there is a minority interest that must be accounted for, equal to the percentage of Abcor not owned by TME times Abcor’s net worth. (0.30)($53,000 – 32,000) = $6,300.
The proportionate consolidation method results in:
| ||
| ||
|
The proportionate consolidation results in the SAME net income and equity as the equity method.
The proportionate consolidation method will least likely achieve the same results as the acquisition method because:
| ||
| ||
|
Proportionate consolidations and acquisitions are the same except for the exclusion of minority interests in proportionate consolidations.
Mustang Corporation formed a special purpose entity (SPE) for purposes of providing research and development. An unrelated firm absorbs the expected losses of the SPE and the independent shareholders of the SPE receive the expected residual returns. Is the SPE considered a variable interest entity (VIE) according to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) and is consolidation required by Mustang, respectively?
| ||
| ||
|
Since the shareholders do not absorb the expected losses, the SPE is considered a VIE. The unrelated firm (not Mustang) that absorbs the losses is the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE.
Firm A recently leased equipment used in its manufacturing plant. If the leased asset is worth less than $100,000 at the end of the lease, Firm A will pay the lessor the difference.
Firm B provided debt financing to an unrelated entity. The debt has a provision whereby Firm B cannot be repaid until all other senior debt is satisfied.
Do Firm A and Firm B have a variable interest?
| ||
| ||
|
A lease residual guarantee and subordinated debt are both examples of variable interests. Firm A will experience a loss if the leased asset is worth less than $100,000 at the end of the lease. Firm B will experience a loss if the senior debt is not paid in full.
Which of the following securities would most likely be characterized as a held-to-maturity security?
| ||
| ||
|
Only debt securities, that a company has a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, can be characterized as a held-to-maturity security.
Accounting standards for intercorporate investments establish different categories of securities with distinct ways of treating them on the financial statements of the company. One category requires the securities to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet with unrealized gains and losses excluded from the income statement. This category of security classification is called debt:
| ||
| ||
|
If securities are designated as debt and equity securities available-for-sale they can be sold to meet the liquidity and other needs of the company. As such, the securities are to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet with unrealized gains and losses excluded from the income statement.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT regarding the classification of debt and equity security investments?
| ||
| ||
|
In the case of available-for-sale securities, unrealized gains and losses are excluded from the income statement and are reported as a component of shareholders' equity.
Accounting standards for passive intercorporate investments include a category of securities that is carried on the company balance sheet at cost. This category of securities is called debt:
| ||
| ||
|
When debt securities are purchased with both the intent and ability to hold them until they mature, they are recorded on the balance sheet at cost.
Which of the following statements about the various classifications of securities held by a firm is least accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
Under SFAS 115, only debt securities, which the firm has the positive intent and ability to hold until final maturity, may be classified as held to maturity.
Accounting standards for passive intercorporate investments establish different categories of securities with distinct ways of treating them on the financial statements of the company. Which of the following categories requires realized and unrealized gains and losses to be reported as income? Debt:
| ||
| ||
|
Accounting standards for passive intercorporate investments include, debt and equity trading securities, is for securities that, when acquired, are intended to be resold within a near term time horizon. They are classified as current assets on the balance sheet, with any realized or unrealized gains and losses reported as income.
Which of the following statements regarding securities classified as held to maturity is most accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
Only debt securities, which the firm has the positive intent and ability to hold until final maturity, may be classified as held to maturity.
Which of the following securities will most likely be characterized as an available-for-sale security?
| ||
| ||
|
Debt or equity securities that are carried on the balance sheet at fair market value and may be sold for liquidity purposes are likely to be considered as available-for-sale.
Trading securities are defined as:
| ||
| ||
|
Debt and equity securities acquired with the intent of selling them in the near future are likely to be considered trading securities.
Cosmo Inc. (Cosmo) invests in two portfolios – Portfolio 1 and Portfolio 2. Portfolio 1 contains securities with an overall intent to profit within a month or two. Portfolio 2 contains equity securities with a moderate amount of acquisition and disposition activity. Which of the following treatments of Cosmo’s reporting of the investments in Portfolios 1 and 2, respectively, is most accurate?
Portfolio 1 | Portfolio 2 |
| ||||
| ||||
|
Portfolio 1 contains held-for-trading securities because it is clear that the securities are acquired with the intent to profit over the near term. Therefore, the unrealized gains and losses would be reported immediately in the income statement.
Portfolio 2 contains available-for-sale securities. There are no debt securities and therefore, it cannot contain held-to-maturity securities. As well, there is no indication that the securities are acquired with the intent to profit over the near term. By default, the correct classification would be available-for-sale. Therefore, the securities (assets) would be reported at fair value.
Omricon Capital Associates specializes in making investments in the small cap market sector. In some cases the firm operates as a supplier of private equity for restructurings. In this instance, the firm views itself as having a value investment focus. In others, it acts as a venture capital firm. Here, the investment focus is usually growth. Finally, in some cases it simply takes passive investment positions in publicly-traded firms. The positions in marketable securities are sometimes considered trading positions, and other times the view is to hold for a longer period until valuation parameters are met or exceeded.
Omricon’s chief compliance officer, Raymond “Buzz” Richards has recently become concerned that the firm may not be correctly following the relevant accounting standards for these investments. To ensure that the rules are being effectively adhered to, he is seeking advice from the accounting firm of Merz-Brokaw and Associates on the matter. Sally Lee is the Merz-Brokaw partner heading up the consulting team assigned to review the situation.
The size of the investments ranges from a few percent of the firm’s outstanding equity, to positions of greater than 50%. Richards says that it has always been his understanding that the percentage of the equity held is the major determinant with respect to which accounting method applies. Lee reminds him that the firm’s intent for its investments also plays a role in determining how they are accounted for.
Some of the firm’s investments have not worked out as planned. Richards has conferred with the firm’s portfolio managers regarding securities being held by the firm that are worth less than when they were acquired, and has presented a list of these investments to Lee. His concern is what this implies for the accounting for these investments. Lee tells him that the issue here is whether or not the security can be considered impaired, and that designating a security as impaired implies that the decline in value is permanent.
Top managers at Omricon have asked Lee to help them evaluate the impact of the choice of accounting method on the firm’s profitability. Some members of the management team are of the belief that the accounting method does not affect financial measures because these are driven by underlying economic factors. Others believe that these measures can be affected by the accounting method chosen.
Which of the following statements concerning percentage ownership and accounting method is most accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
When the percentage ownership is less than 20% (with no significant influence over the investee firm), both US GAAP and IFRS require the investment in financial assets method. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.a)
| ||
| ||
|
When the percentage ownership is exactly 50% (i.e., the investment is a joint venture), IFRS allows for the choice between the equity method and proportionate consolidation, while US GAAP requires the equity method. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.b)
| ||
| ||
|
The three classifications for passive investments in securities that trade in secondary markets (i.e., marketable securities) are trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.a)
| ||
| ||
|
When a passive investment in marketable equity securities is classified as available-for-sale, US GAAP and IFRS require that unrealized gains and losses are reported as equity in other comprehensive income on the balance sheet. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.b)
| ||
| ||
|
A security should be considered impaired when the decline in value is “other than temporary”. That is to say that it is obviously not due to a temporary decline in the market. No one knows for sure if any decline in value is permanent, but in most cases it is obvious that it is not simply a market phenomenon. When this is the case, the asset’s value should be written down to the new fair value, and a loss reported on the income statement. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.a)
| ||
| ||
|
In most cases, the choice of the equity method will result in leverage being lower, net profit margin being higher, and ROA being higher than would be the case under proportionate consolidation. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
Company X owns 15% of company S and exerts significant influence over the operations of the company. The book value of the investment on December 31, 2001, is $48,000. In 2002, company S earned $100,000 and paid dividends of $20,000. The value of the investment account on December 31, 2002, is:
| ||
| ||
|
Because company X exerts significant influence over company S, the investment will be treated using the equity method, even though the ownership is less than the 20% guideline. The value of the investment account is equal to the beginning balance plus the proportionate income of company S minus the dividends received from company S, which equals 48,000 + (0.15 x 100,000) ? (0.15 x 20,000) = 60,000.
Harter Company recently acquired a 40% stake in Compton Corp. for $40 million in cash by borrowing at 10%. Harter will account for this acquisition using which of the following methods:
| ||
| ||
|
The 40% ownership stake would indicate significant control has been gained over the affiliate company. The equity method would be used.
Sawbuck Corporation recently acquired a 60% stake in Rawboard Inc. for $70 million in newly issued common stock. Given this information, which of the following methods should be used to account for the acquisition of Rawboard?
| ||
| ||
|
When the parent company has at least a 50% ownership stake and control over the subsidiary, the acquisition method is used.
Company X owns 15% of company S and exerts significant control over the operations of the company. The book value of the investment on December 31, 2008, is $48,000. In 2009, company S earned $100,000 and paid dividends of $20,000. The impact of the investment on the income statement of company X is:
| ||
| ||
|
Because company X exerts significant control over company S, the investment will be treated using the equity method, even though the ownership is less than the 20% guideline. The impact on the income statement is the proportionate income of company S, which is 0.15 × 100,000 = 15,000.
Acme Corporation purchases a 3% interest in Bandy Company to become the single largest shareholder of Bandy. Acme will hold a seat on the Board of Directors of Bandy. Acme will account for its investment in Bandy using the:
| ||
| ||
|
Even though Acme’s interest is low at only 3%, they have significant influence by having a seat on Bandy’s Board of Directors. As such, they must use the equity method.
GTH Corporation has just purchased 18% of the common stock of Pittor Corporation, one of their major suppliers, making GTH the largest single shareholder in Pittor. The primary motivation for the purchase is that managerial problems at Pittor have resulted in quality control difficulties, thereby affecting the reliability of several critical component parts for GTH products. At the time of the purchase, GTH management announced they plan to be an active and significant influence on Pittor so the quality problems can be resolved. Given these circumstances, the accounting method used to record the intercorporate investment will most likely be the:
| ||
| ||
|
Less than 20% ownership of the acquired corporations common stock would ordinarily mean the cost or market method of accounting would be used to record this investment in financial assets. However, percentage ownership rules are guidelines only and the appropriate accounting method is dependant on the degree of influence the acquirer intends to exert. In this case, GTH has announced their desire to exert significant influence, hence, the equity method is the appropriate choice.
Carter Schmitz, Inc. (Schmitz) purchased 200 shares of Intelismart at $21 a share in June 2006 and intends to actively trade 80 shares in the near future and hold the remaining 120 shares as available for sale securities. Intelismart's closing price was $26 on December 31, 2006, and Schmitz did not sell any of its shares.
What amount should Schmitz report on this investment under the income statement?
| ||
| ||
|
The unrealized gain on the 120 shares available for sale is $600 (26 - 21 = 5 × 120 shares). There is also an unrealized gain of $400 (5 × 80) related to the 80 shares that are trading securities which would be reported on the income statement. For trading securities, realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported on the income statement. For available for sale securities, only realized gains and losses are reported on the income statement.
The Anderson Company acquired 100,000 shares of the Birschbach Company on January 1, 2000, at $25 per share. The market price of a share of Birschbach stock on December 31, 2000, was $35 per share. During 2000, Birschbach paid dividends of $1.50 per share and had earnings of $2.50 per share.
If the Anderson Company accounts for the Birschbach shares as trading securities, the carrying amount of these shares on Anderson's balance sheet at the end of 2000 is:
| ||
| ||
|
Trading securities are measured at fair market value.
(100,000)($35) = $3,500,000
| ||
| ||
|
Available-for-sale securities are measured at fair market value.
(100,000)($35) = $3,500,000
Assuming the equity method of accounting is used, what will be the reported investment income for Birtch?
| ||
| ||
|
Under the equity method, dividends are not included as income to the acquirer. ($700,000 × 0.25) = $175,000 will be the reported investment income for Birtch.
| ||
| ||
|
The cash flow to Birtch will be ($700,000)(0.30)(0.25) = $52,500.
Mashburn Company acquired 25% of the 100,000 outstanding shares of Humm Co. on January 1 for $250,000 in cash. Humm Co. earned $1 per share and had a dividend payout ratio of 40%. As of December 31, Humm Co. shares were trading in the open market at $12 per share. Calculate the income statement treatment of the Humm Co. investment as of December 31.
| ||
| ||
|
Under the equity method, the investor recognizes its pro-rata share of the affiliate's income on the income statement. Since Mashburn owns 25,000 shares of Humm and Humm earned $1, the income statement impact of the investment is $25,000.
Which of the following statements regarding qualifying special purpose entities (QSPE) is most accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
A QSPE can only hold financial assets (and the assets are usually receivables). As a legally separate, independent entity, the QSPE has total control of the assets transferred from the sponsor. Previously, under U.S. GAAP, the sponsor could avoid consolidating asset securitizations by creating a QSPE. QSPEs are no longer permitted under U.S. GAAP or IFRS.
Which of the following statements about variable interest entities (VIE) are correct or incorrect?
Statement #1 |
One potential benefit of a VIE is a lower cost of capital since the assets and liabilities of the VIE are isolated in the event the sponsor experiences financial difficulties. |
Statement #2 |
The organizational form of a VIE must be either a partnership or a joint venture and it is necessary for the VIE to have separate management and employees. |
| ||
| ||
|
Statement #1 is a correct statement. A lower cost of capital is a potential benefit of forming a VIE. Statement #2 is an incorrect statement. The organizational form can be a corporation, partnership, joint venture or trust. It is not necessary for the VIE to have separate management and employees
Maverick Incorporated formed a special purpose entity (SPE) to purchase and lease a 50,000 acre ranch. The SPE financed 95% of the purchase price with debt. The remaining 5% was financed with equity capital received from two separate independent investors. The lender would not make the loan without Maverick’s guarantee. How should Maverick treat the SPE in its financial statements if Maverick is the lessee?
| ||
| ||
|
The 5% at-risk equity investment is not sufficient to support the activities of the SPE without Maverick’s guarantee. Thus, the SPE is considered a variable interest entity (VIE). Since Maverick is responsible for the guarantee, Maverick is the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the SPE.
Which of the following statements about special purpose entities (SPE) are correct or incorrect?
Statement #1: |
The sponsor usually maintains the decision-making power and voting control over the SPE. |
Statement #2: |
The equity owners of an SPE usually receive a rate of return that is tied to the performance of the SPE. |
| ||
| ||
|
Both statements are incorrect. The sponsor does not usually have voting control over the SPE; the activities of an SPE are specifically detailed in governing documents created at the origination of the SPE. The structure of the SPE transfers the risks and rewards from the equity owners to the variable interest owners. In return, the equity owners usually receive a fixed rate of return.
Evergreen Brothers is a large producer of bedding plants and shrubs that are sold to various retail nurseries and home improvement stores located across the western coast of the United States with approximately $85 million in annual sales. Evergreen grows its products at two facilities, one in Northern California and the other in the Southern part of the state. Each production facility currently distributes its products within an approximate 150 mile radius of its location. All aspects of the shipping and delivery of products have historically been provided by an independent, third-party distribution company.
Because of impressive growth in the company's sales over the past several years, management has decided to pursue plans to bring "in-house" the distribution of the company's products. They believe that the projected decreased freight costs as well as the increased efficiencies in more actively managing the distribution of their production should immediately yield increased profit margins. As an initial step, Evergreen has negotiated the price for ten delivery trucks, which could provide all distribution capacity needed for the company's Northern production facility for the upcoming season. Current plans are to continue the use of the independent distribution company for the needs of the firm's Southern facility for at least the next several years.
Under advice from the company's CFO, Evergreen has created a new special purpose entity (SPE), QuickTime, Inc., which will serve as the entity that will purchase the trucks from the dealer. The purchase will be financed through a combination of debt and equity, with the dealer lending 75% of the total cost. The loan is collateralized by both the trucks and Evergreen's guarantee of the debt, as required by the dealer.
Evergreen has arranged for an outside investor to provide the remaining 25% of the upfront costs of the equipment in exchange for 100% of QuickTime's nonvoting stock. In addition, the outside investor is guaranteed an 8% annual return for the life of the financing term. At the end of seven years, QuickTime will be liquidated and Evergreen will have the option of purchasing the equipment for its fair value at that time. The proceeds of the liquidation will be used to repurchase the outside investor's stock at par value. In the event that the liquidation value is insufficient to buy back the outside investor's stock, Evergreen has committed to fund the shortfall.
Management has given its tentative approval of the project and the proposed structure. Questions remain, however, as to the effect of the creation of QuickTime on Evergreen's financial statements. With the relatively recent issuance of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46(R)), the management of Evergreen has not had prior experience with the new consolidation requirements for SPEs.
Which of the following statements regarding special purpose entities (SPEs) is least accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
An SPE can take on one of many legal forms, but does not necessarily have to have separate management or employees from that of the sponsor.
| ||
| ||
|
By transferring the variability in the risk of a project to a sponsor, a lender can provide a lower cost of financing to the company that creates the SPE. In return, the sponsor will receive pro-rata profits or other residual interests in the project.
| ||
| ||
|
To qualify as a VIE under FIN 46(R), any one of four conditions must be met, one of which is the presence of an insufficient at-risk equity investment.
| ||
| ||
|
The outside investor contributed 25% of the necessary capital, but this was not sufficient because the dealer additionally required Evergreen's guarantee in order to close the deal. This condition satisfies the requirements established by FIN 46(R) in order to be classified as a VIE.
| ||
| ||
|
Unlike past accounting treatments of VIEs where consolidation was based upon voting control, FIN 46(R) recognizes the primary beneficiary of a VIE as that entity that absorbs the majority of the risks and enjoys the majority of the benefits of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the VIE on their financial statements.
| ||
| ||
|
Before the issuance of FIN 46(R), consolidation was based upon possession of voting control of an entity. FIN 46(R) uses a risk/reward approach when determining which firm must consolidate the VIE on its financial statements. Since Evergreen is the sole entity exposed to variability in QuickTime's net income, as well asset value, QuickTime should be consolidated on their financial statements.
James White is preparing for the Level 2 CFA exam and is concerned about his knowledge of accounting for marketable equity securities. He has the following data from a previous take-home assignment from his MBA program:
Security Cost 2005 Value 2006 Value ABC $80 $75 $85 HIJ $20 $30 $35 XYZ $40 $20 $45
The portfolio includes 100 shares of each firm; the securities are classified as either held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading securities.
Which of the following statements regarding the income statement and balance sheet treatment of securities classified as held-to-maturity is most accurate? They are carried at:
| ||
| ||
|
Accounting standards require a company to classify its securities into categories based upon the company's intent relative to the eventual disposition of the securities.
One of these categories, held-to-maturity securities, is composed of debt securities which a company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. These securities are carried at the cost on the balance sheet and coupon receipts are considered income.
| ||
| ||
|
Accounting standards require a company to classify its securities into categories based upon the company's intent relative to the eventual disposition of the securities.
One of these categories, available-for-sale securities, may be sold to address the liquidity and other needs of a company. Debt and equity securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value on the balance sheet with unrealized gains and losses excluded from income and reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity.
| ||
| ||
|
Accounting standards require a company to classify its securities into categories based upon the company's intent relative to the eventual disposition of the securities.
One of these categories, trading securities, is for debt and equity securities acquired for the purpose of selling them in the near term. These securities are measured at fair market value and are listed as current assets on the balance sheet. Unrealized and realized gains and losses are reported in income.
| ||
| ||
|
The original portfolio cost was: $8,000 + $2,000 + $4,000 = $14,000 In 2005: $7,500 + $3,000 + $2,000 = $12,500 Thus we write the portfolio down by $1,500 and take an unrealized loss.
| ||
| ||
|
The original portfolio cost was: $8,000 + $2,000 + $4,000 = $14,000 In 2005 the value of the portfolio was: $7,500 + $3,000 + $2,000 = $12,500 In 2006 the value of the portfolio was: $8,500 + $3,500 + $4,500 = $16,500 We write the balance sheet value up to current value and recognize an unrealized gain of $4,000.
Which of the following statements regarding asset securitizations and special purpose entities (SPEs) is most accurate?
| ||
| ||
|
SPEs are often created to securitize assets, usually receivables of the sponsor. Typically, the SPE issues debt to purchase the receivables from the sponsor and the debt is repaid as the receivables are collected.
When the receivables are securitized, the sponsor removes the receivables from the balance sheet and reports the cash inflow as an operating activity in the cash flow statement. If the sponsor still has recourse, the transaction is nothing more than a collateralized borrowing.
On January 9, 2006, Company X purchased $1,000,000 of government bonds and 100,000 shares of stock in Company S for $2,000,000. They are the first marketable securities purchased in the company's history. The company intends on holding the stock for the foreseeable future and holding the bonds to maturity. As of December 31, the bonds were valued at $900,000, and the stocks were valued at $2,200,000. The bonds paid $50,000 of interest and the stocks paid $20,000 of dividends. In 2006, Company S had earnings per share of $0.90.
The marketable securities balance amount shown on the balance sheet is:
| ||
| ||
|
The bonds are classified as debt securities held-to-maturity and are valued at cost. The stocks are classified as debt and equity securities available for sale and are valued at market value.
| ||
| ||
|
The bonds are classified as debt securities held-to-maturity, and the income generated from them is $50,000. The stocks are classified as debt and equity securities available for sale, and although the increased value is reported as an asset, the gain is reported in the securities valuation account in the equity section and not on the income statement. The effect of the stocks on income is the $20,000 of dividends.
Under which of the following is a minority interest account most likely to appear on the consolidated balance sheet?
| ||
| ||
|
Proportionate consolidation is similar to a business acquisition, except the investor only reports the proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of the joint venture. Since only the proportionate share is reported, no minority owners’ interest is necessary.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |