Which of the following is least likely a limitation of the two-stage dividend discount model (DDM)?
| ||
| ||
|
The two-stage DDM uses a different required rate of return (cost of equity) for high-growth period (r) and steady state (rn). Most of the time r > rn, since during the stable period the firm is less risky and shareholders require a lower rate of return.
Historical information used to determine the long-term average returns from equity markets may suffer from survivorship bias, resulting in:
| ||
| ||
|
Survivorship bias refers to the weeding out of underperforming firms, resulting in an inflated value for the mean return.
Multi-stage growth models can become computationally intensive. For this reason they are often referred to as:
| ||
| ||
|
The computationally intensive nature of these models make them a perfect application for a spreadsheet program, hence the name spreadsheet models.
Julie Davidson, CFA, has recently been hired by a well-respected hedge fund manager in New York as an investment analyst. Davidson’s responsibilities in her new position include presenting investment recommendations to her supervisor, who is a principal in the firm. Davidson’s previous position was as a junior analyst at a regional money management firm. In order to prepare for her new position, her supervisor has asked Davidson to spend the next week evaluating the fund’s investment policy and current portfolio holdings. At the end of the week, she is to make at least one new investment recommendation based upon her evaluation of the fund’s current portfolio. Upon examination of the fund’s holdings, Davidson determines that the domestic growth stock sector is currently underrepresented in the portfolio. The fund has stated to its investors that it will aggressively pursue opportunities in this sector, but due to recent profit-taking, the portfolio needs some rebalancing to increase its exposure to this sector. She decides to search for a suitable stock in the pharmaceuticals industry, which, she believes, may be able to provide an above average return for the hedge fund while maintaining the fund’s stated risk tolerance parameters.
Davidson has narrowed her search down to two companies, and is comparing them to determine which is the more appropriate recommendation. One of the prospects is Samson Corporation, a mid-sized pharmaceuticals corporation that, through a series of acquisitions over the past five years, has captured a large segment of the flu vaccine market. Samson financed the acquisitions largely through the issuance of corporate debt. The company’s stock had performed steadily for many years until the acquisitions, at which point both earnings and dividends accelerated rapidly. Davidson wants to determine what impact any additional acquisitions will have on Samson’s future earnings potential and stock performance.
The other prospect is Wellborn Products, a manufacturer of a variety of over-the-counter pediatric products. Wellborn is a relatively new player in this segment of the market, but industry insiders have confidence in the proven track record of the company’s upper management who came from another firm that is a major participant in the industry. The market cap of Wellborn is much smaller than Samson’s, and the company differs from Samson because it has grown internally rather than through the acquisition of its competitors. Wellborn currently has no long-term debt outstanding. While the firm does not pay a dividend, it has recently declared that it intends to begin paying one at the end of the current calendar year.
Select financial information (year-end 2005) for Samson and Wellborn is outlined below:
Samson:
Current Price:
$36.00
Sales:
$75,000,000
Net Income:
$5,700,000
Assets:
$135,000,000
Liabilities:
$95,000,000
Equity:
$60,000,000
Wellborn:
Current Price:
$21.25
Dividends expected to be received at the end of 2006:
$1.25
Dividends expected to be received at the end of 2007:
$1.45
Price expected at year-end 2007:
$27.50
Required return on equity:
9.50%
Risk-free rate:
3.75%
Other financial information:
One-year forecasted dividend yield on market index:
1.75%
Consensus long-term earnings growth rate:
5.25%
Short-term government bill rate:
3.75%
Medium-term government note rate:
4.00%
Long-term government bond rate:
4.25%
It is the beginning of 2006, and Davidson wants use the above data to identify which will have the greatest expected returns. She must determine which valuation model(s) is most appropriate for these two securities. Also, Davidson must forecast sustainable growth rates for each of the companies to assess whether or not they would fit within the fund’s investment parameters.
Using the Gordon growth model (GGM), what is the equity risk premium?
| ||
| ||
|
The GGM calculates the risk premium using forward-looking or expectational data. The equity risk premium is estimated as the one-year forecasted dividend yield on market index, plus the consensus long-term earnings growth rate, minus the long-term government bond yield. Note that because equities are assumed to have a long duration, the long-term government bond yield serves as the proxy for the risk-free rate.
Equity risk premium = 1.75% + 5.25% ? 4.25% = 2.75%
| ||
| ||
|
Both CAPM and APT consider the sensitivity of an asset’s return to various risk factors. CAPM measures an asset’s sensitivity relative to the market portfolio with beta, while APT measures an asset’s sensitivity to a variety of risk factors, such as investor confidence, time horizon, inflation, business-cycle and market-timing.
| ||
| ||
|
Free cash flow models are appropriate for firms such as Wellborn that do not have a dividend payout history.
| ||
| ||
|
The value of Wellborn using a two-period DDM is:
| ||
| ||
|
ROE can be calculated using the DuPont formula, which is: ROE = Net Income / Stockholder’s Equity
ROE = (net income / sales) × (sales / total assets) × (total assets / stockholders’ equity) Therefore: ROE = (5,700,000 / 75,000,000) × (75,000,000 / 135,000,000) × (135,000,000 / 60,000,000) = (0.076) × (0.556) × (2.25) = 0.095 = 9.50%.
| ||
| ||
|
Utilizing the PRAT model, where SGR is a function of profit margin (P), the retention rate (R), asset turnover (A) and financial leverage (T):
g = P × R × A × T g = 0.08 × (1 ? 0.35) × 1.6 × 1.39 = 0.116 = 11.6%.
If an investor had determined that an asset’s market price was too high, (implying that it will soon fall) the expected holding period return (HPR) would be:
| ||
| ||
|
If the investor determined that the asset’s price was too high, then the expected HPR would be less than the required return, and the asset would have a negative alpha.
The volatility of equity returns requires us to use data from long time periods to compute mean returns. One problem that this causes is that:
| ||
| ||
|
The primary problem with using returns gathered over a long time period is that equity premiums vary over time with the market’s perception of risk and relative risk.
The debate over whether to use the arithmetic mean or geometric mean of market returns for the capital asset pricing model (CAPM):
| ||
| ||
|
There are several characteristics of the CAPM that limit its usefulness in determining the required returns, including the uncertainty whether we should use arithmetic or geometric means as the appropriate measure of long-term average returns.
One of the limitations of the dividend discount models (DDMs) is that:
| ||
| ||
|
DDMs are very sensitive to the growth and required return assumptions, and it is often wise to interpret the value as a range rather than a precise dollar amount.
Which of the following is least likely a potential problem associated with the three-stage dividend discount model (DDM)? The:
| ||
| ||
|
If the stable period payout ratio is too low it may result in an extremely low value because the terminal value will be lower due to the smaller dividends being paid out.
Multi-stage dividend discount models can be used to estimate the value of shares:
| ||
| ||
|
Multi-stage dividend discount models are very flexible, allowing their use with an almost infinite variety of growth scenarios.
The H model will NOT be very useful when:
| ||
| ||
|
The H model is useful for firms that are growing rapidly but the growth is expected to decline gradually over time as the firm gets larger and faces increased competition. The assumption of constant payout ratio makes the model inappropriate for firms that have low or no dividend currently.
If the three-stage dividend discount model (DDM) results in extremely high value, the:
| ||
| ||
|
If the three-stage DDM results in an extremely high value, either the growth rate in the stable growth period is too high or the period of growth (high plus transition) is too long. To solve these problems, an analyst should use a growth rate closer to GNP growth and use shorter high-growth and transition periods.
The H-model is more flexible than the two-stage dividend discount model (DDM) because:
| ||
| ||
|
A sudden decline in high growth rate in two-stage DDM may not be realistic. This problem is solved in the H-model, as the initial high growth rate is not constant, but declines linearly over time to reach the stable-growth rate.
Which of the following dividend discount models has the limitation that a sudden decrease to the lower growth rate in the second stage may NOT be realistic?
| ||
| ||
|
The two-stage DDM has the limitation that a sudden decrease to the lower growth rate in the second stage may not be realistic. Further, the model has the difficulty in trying to estimate the length of the high-growth stage.
Free cash flow to equity models (FCFE) are most appropriate when estimating the value of the firm:
| ||
| ||
|
FCFE models attempt to estimate the value of the firm to equity holders. The models take in to account future cash flows due to others, including debt and taxes, and amounts required for reinvestment to continue the firm’s operations.
If an asset was fairly priced from an investor’s point of view, the holding period return (HPR) would be:
| ||
| ||
|
A fairly priced asset would be one that has an expected HPR just equal to the investor’s required return.
If an investor were attempting to capture an asset’s alpha returns, the expected holding period return (HPR) would be:
| ||
| ||
|
Alpha returns are returns in addition to the required returns, so the expected HPR would be higher than the required return.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |