An analyst gathers the following information for ABC Industries:
Market Value of Debt |
$110 million |
Market Value of Equity |
$90 million |
Book Value of Debt |
$100 million |
Book Value of Equity |
$50 million |
EBITDA |
$75 million |
The EV/EBITDA is closest to:
| ||
| ||
|
EV uses market values for debt and equity. (110 + 90) / 75 = 2.67.
[此贴子已经被作者于2011-3-21 11:35:55编辑过]
An analyst gathered the following data for TRK Construction [all amounts in Swiss francs (Sf)]:
Recent share price | Sf 30.00 |
Shares outstanding | Sf 40 million |
Market value of debt | Sf 120 million |
Cash and marketable securities | Sf 75 million |
Investments | Sf 200 million |
Net income | Sf 160 million |
Interest expense | Sf 9 million |
Depreciation and amortization | Sf 12 million |
Taxes | Sf 48 million |
The EV/EBITDA multiple for TRK Construction is closest to:
| ||
| ||
|
EBITDA = (net income + interest + taxes + depreciation / amortization) EV = (market value of common stock + market value of debt – cash and investments)
EBITDA = 160 + 9 + 12 + 48 = Sf 229 million EV = (30 × 40) + 120 – 75 – 200 = Sf 1045 million EV / EBITDA = 4.56
An analyst gathered the following data for TRK Construction [all amounts in Swiss francs (Sf)]:
Recent share price | Sf 22.00 |
Shares outstanding | 40 million |
Market value of debt | Sf 140 million |
Cash and marketable securities | Sf 55 million |
Investments | Sf 300 million |
Net income | Sf 140 million |
Interest expense | Sf 7 million |
Depreciation and amortization | Sf 10 million |
Taxes | Sf 56 million |
The EV/EBITDA ratio for TRK Construction is closest to:
| ||
| ||
|
EBITDA = (net income + interest + taxes + depreciation / amortization) EV = (market value of common stock + market value of debt – cash and investments) EBITDA = 140 + 7 + 10 + 56 = Sf 213 million EV = (22 × 40) + 140 – 55 – 300 = Sf 665 million EV / EBITDA = 3.12
Which of the following are advantages of using EV/EBITDA?
| ||
| ||
|
EBITDA is useful for valuing capital-intensive businesses with high levels of depreciation and amortization. The other statements are disadvantages to using EV/EBITDA.
Which of the following is a disadvantage to using EV/EBITDA?
| ||
| ||
|
Since FCFF captures the amount of capital expenditures, it is more strongly linked with valuation theory than EBITDA. The other statements are advantages.
An analyst gathered the following data for TRK Construction [all amounts in Swiss francs (Sf)]:
Recent share price | Sf 25.00 |
Shares outstanding | 40 million |
Market value of debt | Sf 130 million |
Cash and marketable securities | Sf 65 million |
Investments | Sf 250 million |
Net income | Sf 150 million |
Interest expense | Sf 8 million |
Depreciation and amortization | Sf 11 million |
Taxes | Sf 52 million |
The EV/EBITDA multiple for TRK Construction is closest to:
| ||
| ||
|
EBITDA = (net income + interest + taxes + depreciation / amortization) EV = (market value of common stock + market value of debt – cash and investments) EBITDA = 150 + 8 + 11 + 52 = Sf 221 million EV = (25 × 40) + 130 – 65 – 250 = Sf 815 million EV / EBITDA = 3.69
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |