Which of the following is a disadvantage to using the comparables approach to valuing investments in closely held companies?
| ||
| ||
|
A discount rate and an estimate of future income are both variables used in the income approach. The cost to replace a company’s asset is a factor when using the cost approach. The benchmark value used in the comparable may be mispriced or difficult to establish if no comparable companies have been sold recently.
Regarding closely held companies, the valuation adjustment, due to the lack of a public market for the shares, is called a:
| ||
| ||
|
A minority discount would be applied to shares that represent a non-controlling minority interest in a company. Shares of closely held companies are not publicly traded, so the shares should be discounted an appropriate amount to reflect this lack of marketability.
Approaches commonly used in the valuation of closely held companies include all of the following EXCEPT the:
| ||
| ||
|
The cost approach and the comparables approach are both used in the valuation of closely held companies. The fundamental value approach is a fictitious approach.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |