Board logo

标题: Fixed vs. Floating Duration [打印本页]

作者: willsucceed    时间: 2011-7-11 15:21     标题: Fixed vs. Floating Duration

Why does having Fixed cash flows have a higher duration than Floating ?
作者: former    时间: 2011-7-11 15:21

Floating duration is based upon the tenor of the floating leg..eg 3 m libor duration is 0.25
作者: nannan66    时间: 2011-7-11 15:22

because floating rates reset often, thus they have a shorter duration
作者: bpdulog    时间: 2011-7-11 15:22

There is some kind of flaw in this argument , that I can't pinpoint.

Are rates going to zero after the swap reset . Won't the floating rate reset to some reasonable rate after the reset? The calculation pretends that the floater has no obligation after the reset.
作者: bboo    时间: 2011-7-11 15:22

Duration measures the linear interest rate sensitivity of interest rate sensitive instruments. For floating rate instruments, as you are not locked in fixed interest rate, your interest rate risk is limited only to next coupon reset date, so is duration.
作者: mik82    时间: 2011-7-11 15:22

Thanks. I love CFA.
作者: thommo77    时间: 2011-7-11 15:22

cfalover Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So which has a higher duration....Pay
> fixed/receive floating or....Receive Fixed/pay
> floating?


u tell me mr lover lover ..............in the first ur short duration .........you gave away the larger duration to receive the smaller duration..................


vice versa for the second




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2